Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GEORGOTAS, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GEORGOTAS, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1983 Oxford University Press

research-article

AFFECTIVE DISORDERS IN THE ELDERLY: DIAGNOSTIC AND RESEARCH CONSIDERATIONS

ANASTASE GEORGOTAS, Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Director

Depression Studies Program, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Medical Center 550 First Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10016

Although depressive disorders in the elderly represent a major public health concern by virtue of their high cost in human suffering, disability, and potential suicide, they have not been studied extensively, and specific criteria for diagnostic classification and optimal treatment are lacking. It seems likely that many of the affective syndromes in the elderly like senile melancholia, manic depressive illness, pseudodementia, and masked depression belong to the group of endogenous depressions, and can be identified by a constellation of clinical symptoms (endogenous or endogenomorphic profile), abnormal dexamethasone suppression test (DST) (at least 50%), and positive response to treatment with antidepressant medication. The rest are depressions reactive to psychogenic or sociogenic factors frequently presenting agitation as a dominant symptom, and finally there is a group of organic depressions due to underlying organic brain change, (i.e. senile dementia). It is possible that careful psychometric and psychiatric evaluation based on the symptom pattern, DST, and response to treatment would reveal reliable differences between pseudodementia and mild dementia and distinguish endogenomorphic from non-endogenomorphic depressions, respectively. The validity of such an approach remains to be demonstrated. Biological research in this area has provided valuable findings and should be the aim for the 1980s.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
G. A. Yorston and P. J. Taylor
Commentary: Older Offenders--No Place to Go?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2006; 34(3): 333 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 History of PsychiatryHome page
L. Ben-Noun
Mental Disorder that Afflicted King David the Great
History of Psychiatry, December 1, 2004; 15(4): 467 - 476.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.