Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HILDICK-SMITH, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HILDICK-SMITH, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1984 Oxford University Press

research-article

GERIATRIC DAY HOSPITALS—CHANGING EMPHASIS IN COSTS

M. HILDICK-SMITH, Consultant Physician in Geriatric Medicine

Nunnery Fields Hospital Canterbury, Kent CT1 3LP

One of the factors which may have influenced day hospital expansion is that day hospital treatment was earlier found to be cheaper than in-patient treatment, as some of the ‘hotel’ costs were avoided. The increasing price of ambulance transport has reduced this advantage. Further reduction occurs if the expenses of keeping a patient at home (community services, share of housing, etc.) are set against in-patient costs. Using such detailed comparisons, treatment up to twice weekly at a Day Hospital provides good value for money, but more frequent treatments can prove costlier than in-patient or residential care.

Realistic attempts are now being made to cost a complete course of treatment, for example three months' visits to a day hospital. Depending on whether this is regarded as equivalent to 15 or 10 weeks as an in-patient, the relative cost of day hospital treatment is 32–90% of in-patient costs. ‘Throughput’ is as vital to day hospitals as to wards, and the average number of visits for day hospital treatment has decreased over the years from 40–20, and the recommended size from 50 to 30 places.

Critics of comparisons between in-patient and day patient treatment emphasize that we are not comparing like with like. Day hospital treatment relates more closely to independence and accords with the preferred wishes of most patients and families.

Costing involves not only money but staffing and here the day hospital continues to show advantage. Not only can day hospitals attract nurses and (scarce) therapists, but a nurse can maintain ten times as many patients in the day hospital as she can in the wards. Over 4/5 of day hospital patients have help at home from a chief carer (member of family, neighbour, friend, Home Help, etc.). These helpers increase greatly the number available to care for the old at home and this is the most vital factor in the comparison of costs between day hospital and in-patient care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. Hui, C.M. Lum, J. Woo, K.H. Or, and R. L.C. Kay
Outcomes of Elderly Stroke Patients : Day Hospital Versus Conventional Medical Management
Stroke, September 1, 1995; 26(9): 1616 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
International Social WorkHome page
V. Sakadakis and M. J. MacLean
The role of the social worker with ethnic elderly people in geriatric day hospitals
International Social Work, January 1, 1993; 36(1): 47 - 59.
[PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. B Young and A. Forster
The Bradford community stroke trial: eight week results
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1991; 5(4): 283 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. Young and A. Forster
Methodology of a stroke rehabilitation trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1991; 5(2): 127 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.