Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MONTALTO, G.
Right arrow Articles by NOTARBARTOLO, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MONTALTO, G.
Right arrow Articles by NOTARBARTOLO, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

research-article

Prevalence of Biliary Lithiasis in the Elderly People of a Small Town in Sicily

G. MONTALTO, M. SORESI, A. CARROCCIO, M. R. AVERNA, R. MURATORE, C. LI CASTRI, C. M. BARBAGALLO, G. CAVERA, M. SAPIENZA and A. NOTARBARTOLO

Cattedra di Patologia Medica II, Università di Palermo e Divisione di Medicina Geriatrica USL 61, Palermo, Italy

Address correspondence to: Dr G. Montalto, Istituto di Medicina Interna e Geriatna, via del Vespro 141, 90127 Palermo, Italy

The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of biliary lithiasis (BL) and its major associated factors in the elderly people of a small town in Sicily. All inhabitants over the age of 65 were interviewed and underwent a general physical examination, blood tests and ultrasonography of the gallbladder and biliary tracts. The final group included 328 subjects (162 men and 166 women), representing 63.1% of the population asked to participate, with a mean age of 74.3±6.8 years (range 65–95). The prevalence of BL (lithiasis in progress+subjects cholecystectomized for previous calculosis) was 18.6%. No male subject had been cholecystectomized. Prevalence was higher in women than in men, but there was no progressive increase with age. There was no significant correlation between number of pregnancies and BL and there was no statistically significant difference between subjects with and without lithiasis for total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, A–I and B apoprotein values; a significant difference was found only for body weight values (p < 0.01). Stones were more often multiple and more radiopaque than in younger subjects; specific symptoms and positive family histories were found in 22% and 18% of the study group, respectively.

Received January 17, 1992;
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.