Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SOLOMON, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by ADAMS, K. H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SOLOMON, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by ADAMS, K. H. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 Oxford University Press

research-article

Attitudes of Relatives to Autopsies of Elderly Patients

S. A. SOLOMON and K. H. R. ADAMS

Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Bolton General Hospital Minerva Road, Farnworth, Bolton BL4 0JR

The attitudes of 233 relatives to autopsy of elderly medical patients (mean age 82 years) who died in a district general hospital were examined prospectively. Forty-three (18%) relatives were asked permission for autopsy, 24 (56%) agreed and 19 (44%) refused. Of 190 (82%) relatives whose permission was not sought, 109 (57%) would have agreed and 81 (43%) would have refused permission had they been asked. Advancement of medicine and reassurance about the correct diagnosis were the main reasons for consent, while dislike of autopsy, family distress at disfigurement of the body and the patient ‘having suffered enough’ were the main reasons for refusal. Living near rather than with the deceased (64% vs 45%; %2 = 6.985, p = 0.01) and being a male rather than female relative (63% vs 49%; Z2 = 3.879, p = 0.05) were predictive of a positive response to autopsy.

Of the 39 autopsies performed, 24 (9.6%) followed relatives' permission and 15 (6%) were at the request of the coroner. The overall autopsy rate of 16% was lower than the rate recommended for medical audit (35%). Although there is a need for educating relatives about the benefits of autopsy, a more urgent study is required to find reasons for the low request by medical staff.

Received August 27, 1992;
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C Snowdon, D R Elbourne, and J Garcia
Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2004; 89(3): F200 - F203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
K Lishimpi, C Chintu, S Lucas, V Mudenda, J Kaluwaji, A Story, D Maswahu, G Bhat, A J Nunn, and A Zumla
Necropsies in African children: consent dilemmas for parents and guardians
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2001; 84(6): 463 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
G. E. Rosenbaum, J. Burns, J. Johnson, C. Mitchell, M. Robinson, and R. D. Truog
Autopsy Consent Practice at US Teaching Hospitals: Results of a National Survey
Arch Intern Med, February 14, 2000; 160(3): 374 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied GerontologyHome page
S. M. Macey and D. F. Schneider
Frailty and Mortality Among the Elderly
Journal of Applied Gerontology, March 1, 1995; 14(1): 22 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.