Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HARWOOD, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by EBRAHIM, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HARWOOD, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by EBRAHIM, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 Oxford University Press

research-article

Assessing the Effectiveness of Audit in Long-stay Hospital Care for Elderly People

ROWAN H. HARWOOD and SHAH EBRAHIM

Department of Health Care of the Elderly, Royal London Hospital (Mile End) London El 4DG

Address correspondence to: Dr R. H. Harwood, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Royal Free Hospital Medical School, London NW3 2PF

We wished to assess the impact of an audit package (the Royal College of Physicians CARE scheme) on outcomes in institutional care for elderly people. We compared patients in audited and unaudited units in four hospital continuing-care wards and a National Health Service nursing home. Ninety-three hospital long-stay patients and 26 nursing home patients were observed. Changes in disability (measured using the Barthel Index, Clifton Assessment Procedure for the Elderly and Crichton Royal Behaviour Rating Scale), deaths, satisfaction with life, and relative's satisfaction with care were recorded. Odds ratios for unfavourable outcomes were calculated after adjusting for potential confounders.

Initial disability was similar on two audited wards and two control wards, but significantly less in the (audited) nursing home; 11% of patients died on the control wards, compared with 35% on the audited wards (p=0.02 There were no consistent differences between changes in disability or satisfaction scores on the intervention and control units, although confidence intervals were wide. Staff attitudes towards the scheme were positive. We conclude that audit in long-term care was not associated with measurable improvements in outcomes. Intermediate process indicators of the impact of audit are needed. Positive staff attitudes to audit were encouraging, and suggest that further modifications of the CARE scheme should be evaluated.

Received November 28, 1993;
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.