© 1995 Oxford University Press
research-article |
How Useful are Non-random Comparisons of Outcomes and Quality of Care in Purchasing Hospital Stroke Services?
University Department of Public Health, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF
We performed a prospective observational study using a stroke register, case-note review and survey of carers with 6 months of follow-up in two adjacent health districts in East London. District 1 was a teaching district and had no special stroke service; District 2 had a comprehensive stroke service comprising stroke unit, review of all stroke admissions and community follow-up.
Three hundred and sixty-one consecutive patients with stroke admitted to hospital and 103 carers were surveyed at 6 months from admission using the Royal College of Physicians (London) Stroke Audit standards. We also assessed mortality, disability, perceived health, mood, and satisfaction with services 6 months after stroke, carer mood, perceived health and satisfaction with services.
The standard of care was below that set by the Royal College of Physicians of London in both districts and there were no significant differences between the districts in age-standardized mortality at 1 and 6 months, Barthel score, extended ADL score, Geriatric Depression score, Nottingham Health Profile score and patient satisfaction with services at 6 months. Carer outcomes did not differ between districts. Service costs, particularly costs of rehabilitation services, were much lower in District 2.
A comprehensive district stroke service was not associated with major differences in patient outcomes or standards of care. This may have been because the non-random nature of the comparison meant that the patients differed in other ways than in the nature of treatment. Caution is needed when using these techniques in making purchasing decisions.
Revision received July 5, 1994.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Luengo-Fernandez, A. M. Gray, and P. M. Rothwell Costs of Stroke Using Patient-Level Data: A Critical Review of the Literature Stroke, February 1, 2009; 40(2): e18 - e23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Seenan, M. Long, and P. Langhorne Stroke Units in Their Natural Habitat: Systematic Review of Observational Studies Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 1886 - 1892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K Walsh, P H Gompertz, and A G Rudd Stroke care: how do we measure quality? Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2002; 78(920): 322 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Tyson and G. Turner Discharge and follow-up for people with stroke: what happens and why Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2000; 14(4): 381 - 392. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. F Tyson and G. Turner The process of stroke rehabilitation: what happens and why Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 1999; 13(4): 322 - 332. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. D. A. Wolfe, K. Tilling, R. Beech, and A. G. Rudd Variations in Case Fatality and Dependency From Stroke in Western and Central Europe Stroke, February 1, 1999; 30(2): 350 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Pound, K. Tilling, A. G. Rudd, and C. D.A. Wolfe Does Patient Satisfaction Reflect Differences in Care Received After Stroke? Stroke, January 1, 1999; 30(1): 49 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Patel, J. Potter, I. Perez, and L. Kalra The Process of Rehabilitation and Discharge Planning in Stroke : A Controlled Comparison Between Stroke Units Stroke, December 1, 1998; 29(12): 2484 - 2487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Pound, P. Gompertz, and S. Ebrahim A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 1998; 12(4): 338 - 347. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Pound, P. Gompertz, and S. Ebrahim A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 1998; 12(3): 255 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Monane, D. S. Kanter, R. J. Glynn, and J. Avorn Variability in Length of Hospitalization for Stroke: The Role of Managed Care in an Elderly Population Arch Neurol, September 1, 1996; 53(9): 875 - 880. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|