Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MAYOL, J.
Right arrow Articles by ALVAREZ FERNÁNDEZ-REPRESA, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MAYOL, J.
Right arrow Articles by ALVAREZ FERNÁNDEZ-REPRESA, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press

research-article

Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the ageing patient

JULIO MAYOL, JAVIER MARTINEZ-SARMIENTO, FRANCISCO J. TAMAYO and JESUS ALVAREZ FERNÁNDEZ-REPRESA

Servicio de Grugia I, Hospital Universrtario San Carlos, Martin-Lagos S/N, E-28040 Madrid, Spain

Address correspondence to:J. Mayol. Fax: (+34) 1 330 31 66.

AIM:: to determine the safety of simple laparoscopic cholecystectomy in ageing patients.

METHOD:: the outcome of patients between 60 and 70 years of age and patients over 70 who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic non-malignant gallbladder disease was comparatively analysed. All patients over 60 years of age with symptomatic gallbladder disease and without cholecholithiasis, septic shock, diffuse peritonitis, gallbladder malignancy, portal hypertension or contraindication for general anaesthesia were selected for simple laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n + 158). This group represents over 80% of all elderly patients undergoing biliary surgery at our department over this period. Group A (n + 97) included patients from 60 to 69 years of age. Group B (n + 61) comprised patients over 70 years.

RESULTS:: there was no difference in sex distribution between groups. Operative time and conversion rates were similar in both groups. The overall morbidity rate was 14.5%, with no statistically significant increase in group B (11% for group A vs 20% for group B). No perioperative mortality occurred. Recurrent biliary surgery was required in two patients from group B (3%). Postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy was done in four patients from group A (4%). The mean postoperative stay was longer for older patients (group A, 3.1 (2.5) days; group B, 4.2 (4.3) days; i+0.05).

CONCLUSION:: simple laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe in the aged, even for patients over 70. This procedure is associated with a short hospital stay and low rates of re-admission and recurrent biliary surgery

Keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy, age, ageing patients, complications

Received September 18, 1996;
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
D. M. Weber
Laparoscopic Surgery: An Excellent Approach in Elderly Patients
Arch Surg, October 1, 2003; 138(10): 1083 - 1088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
C Wagner, G van der Wal, P P Groenewegen, and D H de Bakker
The effectiveness of quality systems in nursing homes: a review
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2001; 10(4): 211 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.