Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fries, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Park, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fries, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Park, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press

Articles

Approaching Cross-National Comparisons of Nursing Home Residents

Brant E. Fries, Marianne Schroll1, Catherine Hawes2, Ruedi Gilgen3, Palmi V JÓnsson4 and PL Park5

Institute of Gerontology and School of Public Health, University of Michigan 300 North Ingalls, Ann Arbor MI 48109-2007, USA and VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
1 Department of Geriatrics HL Kommunehospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
2 Research Triangle Institute Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
3 Klinik für Geriatrie und Rehabilitation, Stadtspital Waid Zürrich Zürrich, Switzerland
4 Department of Geriatrics, Reykjavik Hospital, University of Iceland Reykjavik, Iceland
5 Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Ml, USA

Address correspondence to B. E. Fries. Fax: (+1) 313 936 2116. E-mail: bfries{at}umich.edu

Method: Since the 1990 implementation of the US nursing home Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), researchers in other nations have begun to use the RAI to assess institutionalized elders for payment, research, or planning purposes. We report comparative statistics representing institutionalized residents in seven nations, describing from several hundred to hundreds of thousands of residents.

Results: Significant differences are seen in age and length of stay, and in summary measures of physical and cognitive functioning and case-mix. Countries also differ in their homogeneity across nursing homes.

Conclusion: These differences strengthen the position that ‘nursing home’ does not provide a sound basis for cross-national comparisons, and should be replaced with resident-specific descriptors. This also suggests that cross-national comparisons need to adjust at the level of the individual resident for differences in resident populations

Keywords: case-mix, long-term care, facility variability


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.