Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (45)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PARKER, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by CASTLEDEN, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PARKER, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by CASTLEDEN, C. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

other

Measuring health status in older patients. The SF-36 in practice

STUART G. PARKER, SUSAN M. PEET, CAROL JAGGER1, MAHDI FARHAN2 and C. MARK CASTLEDEN

Division of Medicine for the Elderly, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
2Department of General Practice, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK

Address correspondence to: S. G. Parker. Fax: (+44) 116 2854666. email: sgp5{at}leicester.ac.uk

Objective: to examine the use of the Medical Outcomes Study short form 36-item (SF-36) health status measure in older patients receiving health care; to explore the influence of age and physical and cognitive status on response to and completion of the SF-36 questionnaire.

Design: prospective observational study.

Settings: hospital and ambulatory patients aged 65 years and over in the medical and surgical wards and outpatient department of a teaching hospital and a local general practitioner's surgery.

Subjects: 1014 hospital inpatients, 80 hospital outpatients and 40 patients attending their general practitioner's surgery.

Main outcome measures: response rates, overall rates of completion (sufficient to calculate a valid SF-36 score) and completion of individual questions.

Results: 37 out of 40 ambulatory patients in general practice (93%) and 71 out of 80 outpatients (89%) returned a self-completed questionnaire. In hospital inpatients the overall response rate was only 46% (369 of 802). This was improved by interview administration to 77.4% (164 of 212). Logistic regression analysis revealed that selfcompletion, cognitive dysfunction, disability and age were all independently associated with poor overall response rates. Among those patients who returned a completed questionnaire, completion of individual questions sufficient to calculate a valid score was variable. Only 62.5% of inpatients who self-completed a questionnaire gave sufficient response to calculate a score on the mental health subscale, compared with 93.7% of general practice patients.

Conclusion: the self-administered questionnaire is unacceptable for older hospital inpatients. Use of an interviewer improves response, but factors which influence health status, such as physical and cognitive dysfunction, have a significant effect on response rates. Therefore the utility of the SF-36 in its present form as a routine health status measure for use in older hospital inpatients is questioned.

Keywords: disability, elderly, health status, inpatients, quality of life, SF-36

Received January 29, 1997;
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
S. G. Parker, D. Bechinger-English, C. Jagger, N. Spiers, and J. Lindesay
Factors affecting completion of the SF-36 in older people
Age Ageing, July 1, 2006; 35(4): 376 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
K. Dunderdale, D. R. Thompson, J. N.V. Miles, S. F. Beer, and G. Furze
Quality-of-life measurement in chronic heart failure: do we take account of the patient perspective?
Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2005; 7(4): 572 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
T Hillen, S Davies, A G Rudd, T Kieselbach, and C D Wolfe
Self ratings of health predict functional outcome and recurrence free survival after stroke
J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2003; 57(12): 960 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
L. A Beaupre, D. M Davies, C A. Jones, and J. G Cinats
Exercise Combined With Continuous Passive Motion or Slider Board Therapy Compared With Exercise Only: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Patients Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
Physical Therapy, April 1, 2001; 81(4): 1029 - 1037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
S W Parry, N Steen, S R Galloway, R A Kenny, and J Bond
Falls and confidence related quality of life outcome measures in an older British cohort
Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2001; 77(904): 103 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
H. Rodgers, C. Atkinson, S. Bond, M. Suddes, R. Dobson, and R. Curless
Randomized Controlled Trial of a Comprehensive Stroke Education Program for Patients and Caregivers
Stroke, December 1, 1999; 30(12): 2585 - 2591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.