Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HIGGS, P. F. D.
Right arrow Articles by WARD, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HIGGS, P. F. D.
Right arrow Articles by WARD, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

other

Home from home: residents' opinions of nursing homes and long-stay wards

PAUL F. D. HIGGS, LEA D. MACDONALD1, JOHN S. MACDONALD2 and MICHAEL C. WARD3

Academic Department of Psychiatry, University College London Wolfson Building, Riding House Street, London WIN 8AA, UK
1Department of Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School London, UK
2Management Centre Kings College, London, UK
3Department of Medicine for the Elderly, St Helier NHS Trust Carshalton, Surrey, UK

P F. D. Higgs. Fax: (+44) 171 323 1459

Objective: to compare the levels of satisfaction expressed by residents of nursing homes with those of patients in geriatric long-stay wards.

Design: a structured satisfaction questionnaire containing 37 closed and two open questions was used to elicit responses from residents of nursing homes in the former South West Thames Regional Health Authority area. This was compared with a similar survey using the same questionnaire among patients in geriatric long-stay wards surveyed in 1989.

Setting: respondents came from a sample of nursing homes chosen to be representative of both size and geographical location. Nursing homes were stratified by number of beds (1–19, 20–29, 30+) and clustered by location (to reflect the urban, semi-rural and coastal nature of the region).

Subjects: a random sample was drawn from each grouping (size and location) to yield a resident sample of 850 in 36 nursing homes. This figure was similar to the number of patients (808) in geriatric long-stay wards surveyed in 1989. All eligible nursing home patients were assessed for physical dependency. Mental confusion was ascertained by the Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS). Patients who scored three or less on the AMTS (indicative of severe confusion) or had dysphasia, profound deafness or concurrent serious illness were excluded from further study.

Results: 377 nursing home residents were able to complete the questionnaire and their answers were compared with those of 291 long-stay geriatric patients. The responses to the five themes—relations with staff, autonomy, amenities, privacy and social environment—show some minor differences between the two groups but what is more noticeable is the similarity of their views. This is important as much social policy assumes that the more ‘homely’ atmosphere of the nursing home should elicit higher levels of satisfaction than the ‘institutional’ setting of the hospital ward.

Conclusion: we conclude that the difference between nursing homes and hospital wards in terms of their institutionalizing capacities is not as profound as policy-makers believe.

Keywords: institutionalization, nursing homes, residents' opinions, social policy

Received February 21, 1997;
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied GerontologyHome page
G. E. West, D. Ouellet, and S. Ouellette
Resident and Staff Ratings of Foodservices in Long-Term Care: Implications for Autonomy and Quality of Life
Journal of Applied Gerontology, February 1, 2003; 22(1): 57 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.