Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PARKKARI, J.
Right arrow Articles by KANNUS, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PARKKARI, J.
Right arrow Articles by KANNUS, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

other

Acceptability and compliance with wearing energy-shunting hip protectors: a 6-month prospective follow-up in a Finnish nursing home

JARI PARKKARI, JUSSI HEIKKILÄ1 and PEKKA KANNUS

Accident and Trauma Research Centre, UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Kaupinpuistonkatu I, FIN-33500 Tampere, Finland
1Orthopaedic Service, Finnish Red Cross Tampere, Finland

J. Parkkari. Fax: (+358) 3 282 9200

Objectives: to assess the acceptability and compliance with use of an energy-shunting hip protector in institutionalized elderly people.

Design and setting: a 6-month prospective follow-up in a Finnish nursing home.

Participants: 19 ambulatory nursing home residents with a high risk of hip fracture.

Main outcome measures: the proportion of the residents who were willing to use the device, the number of hours of wearing the protector and the attitudes of the study subjects and the caregivers towards the appearance, comfort, fit, efficacy and laundering of the protector.

Results: 12 of the 19 ambulatory residents (63%) agreed to use the protector. During the study period, these subjects wore the protector on average for more than 90% of their active days, i.e. the days they were mobile. Two subjects wore the protectors at night time; the rest only during waking hours. Mean wearing time during waking hours exceeded 90%.

Conclusion: external hip joint protectors are a feasible strategy to prevent hip fractures in institutionalized elderly people. The attitude, education and motivation of the staff may be a factor in achieving good user compliance. Further community-based studies on acceptability and compliance in wearing external hip joint protectors are needed for verification of benefits to the general population of older people.

Keywords: elderly, hip fracture, hip protector, prevention

Received April 23, 1997;
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
C Cryer, A Knox, and E Stevenson
Factors associated with hip protector adherence among older people in residential care
Inj. Prev., February 1, 2008; 14(1): 24 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
P.K. Myint, K.E.S. Poole, and E.A. Warburton
Hip fractures after stroke and their prevention
QJM, September 1, 2007; 100(9): 539 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
C. Cryer, A. Knox, and E. Stevenson
Factors associated with the initial acceptance of hip protectors amongst older people in residential care
Age Ageing, January 1, 2006; 35(1): 72 - 75.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
L Forsen, S Sandvig, A Schuller, and A J Sogaard
Compliance with external hip protectors in nursing homes in Norway
Inj. Prev., December 1, 2004; 10(6): 344 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Nurs ResHome page
P. Routasalo
Commentary
Clin Nurs Res, May 1, 2004; 13(2): 111 - 116.
[PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
S. Patel, L. Ogunremi, and U. Chinappen
Acceptability and compliance with hip protectors in community-dwelling women at high risk of hip fracture
Rheumatology, June 1, 2003; 42(6): 769 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J Woo, C Sum, H H Yiu, K Ip, L Chung, and L Ho
Efficacy of a specially designed hip protector for hip fracture prevention and compliance with use in elderly Hong Kong Chinese
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2003; 17(2): 203 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
G. Meyer, A. Warnke, R Bender, and I Muhlhauser
Effect on hip fractures of increased use of hip protectors in nursing homes: cluster randomised controlled trial
BMJ, January 11, 2003; 326(7380): 76 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
C Cryer, A Knox, D Martin, and J Barlow
Hip protector compliance among older people living in residential care homes
Inj. Prev., September 1, 2002; 8(3): 202 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
I. D Cameron
Hip protectors
BMJ, February 16, 2002; 324(7334): 375 - 376.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. Kannus, J. Parkkari, S. Niemi, M. Pasanen, M. Palvanen, M. Jarvinen, and I. Vuori
Prevention of Hip Fracture in Elderly People with Use of a Hip Protector
N. Engl. J. Med., November 23, 2000; 343(21): 1506 - 1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.