Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MORGAN, R.
Right arrow Articles by KING, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MORGAN, R.
Right arrow Articles by KING, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

research-article

Rectal examinations in elderly subjects: attitudes of patients and doctors

ROSEMARY MORGAN, BRANWELL SPENCER1 and DEBRA KING1

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Stepping Hill Hospital Stockport SK2 7JE, UK
1Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Arrowe Park Hospital Wirral, Merseyside L49 5PE, UK

Address correspondence to: R. Morgan. Fax: (+44) 151 604 7192

OBJECTIVE:: to determine the attitudes of older patients and hospital doctors to rectal examinations.

DESIGN:: a structured interview and audit of case notes.

SETTING:: departments of medicine for the elderly in two NHS hospitals.

SUBJECTS:: 178 mentally alert patients and 76 hospital doctors in general and geriatric medicine.

RESULTS:: some patients would feel embarrassed (13%), offended (2%), reluctant (11%) or neutral (73%) if asked to undergo a rectal examination (PR). Most (76%) thought a PR examination was important and 92% would give permission if a doctor asked. Of 200 case notes audited, only 38 patients had a PR documented.Of the hospital doctors interviewed 3 said they would routinely do a PR examination. Some doctors lacked confidence in detecting a rectal mass (33%) or abnormal prostate (41%). Thirty (39%) of doctors thought elderly patients were offended by PR examinations and 65% that there was not sufficient training in this procedure.

CONCLUSION:: most older patients do not find PR examinations disagreeable and regard it as an important examination. Despite this, few doctors routinely perform this procedure and some feel unable to detect abnormalities. The importance of PR examinations and adequate training needs to be addressed.

Keywords: elderly subjects, rectal examination

Received April 13, 1997;
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.