Age and Ageing, Vol 28, 9-13, Copyright © 1999 by British Geriatrics Society
TA Roper, S Redford and RC Tallis
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression
in treating oedema in the hemiplegic hand of stroke patients. DESIGN:
Single-blind randomized control trial. SETTING: acute and rehabilitation
elderly care wards in a teaching district. SUBJECTS: 37 Subjects with a
first ever hemisphere stroke were randomized to treatment with standard
physiotherapy either alone or combined with intermittent pneumatic
compression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effect of treatment on oedema was
assessed using measures of the hand volume of the hemiplegic hand. The
impact on function was assessed using the motricity index. RESULTS: The
treated group showed no change in the mean stroke hand volume. In the
control group the mean stroke hand volume decreased by 3.2 ml. There was no
statistically significant difference between the groups. The median scores
for the motricity index increased for both groups but there was no
significant difference between the groups and any improvement in motor
function was independent of any treatment effects. CONCLUSION: Intermittent
pneumatic compression at the prescribed pressure and duration of this study
is not an effective treatment for the oedematous stroke hand.
ARTICLES
Intermittent compression for the treatment of the oedematous hand in hemiplegic stroke: a randomized controlled trial
Elderly Services Directorate, St. James's Hospital, Leeds, UK.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H G. Boomkamp-Koppen, J. M. Visser-Meily, M W. Post, and A J. Prevo Poststroke hand swelling and oedema: prevalence and relationship with impairment and disability Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2005; 19(5): 552 - 559. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R P. Van Peppen, G Kwakkel, S Wood-Dauphinee, H J. Hendriks, P. J Van der Wees, and J Dekker The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2004; 18(8): 833 - 862. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
