Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Den Noortgate, N.
Right arrow Articles by Colardyn, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Den Noortgate, N.
Right arrow Articles by Colardyn, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing, Vol 28, 253-256, Copyright © 1999 by British Geriatrics Society


ARTICLES

Intensive care for very elderly patients: outcome and risk factors for in-hospital mortality

N Van Den Noortgate, D Vogelaers, M Afschrift and F Colardyn
Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University Hospital Gent, Belgium.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate outcome and risk factors, particularly the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system, for in-hospital mortality in very elderly patients after admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients > or =85 years admitted to the ICU. We recorded age, sex, previous medical history, primary diagnosis, date of admission and discharge or death, APACHE II score on admission, use of mechanical ventilation and inotropics, and complications during ICU admission. RESULTS: 104 patients > or =85 years (1.3% of all ICU admissions) were studied. The ICU and in-hospital mortality rates for these patients were 22 and 36% respectively. Factors correlated with a greater in- hospital mortality were: an admission diagnosis of acute respiratory failure (chi2; P = 0.007), the use of mechanical ventilation (chi2; P = 0.00005) and inotropes (chi2; P = 0.00001), complications during ICU admission (chi2; P = 0.004), in particular acute renal failure (chi2; P = 0.005), and an APACHE II score > or =25 (chi2; P = 0.001). The APACHE II scoring system and the use of inotropes were independently correlated with mortality. CONCLUSION: ICU and in-hospital mortality are higher in very elderly patients, particularly in those with an APACHE II score > or =25. The most important predictors of mortality are the use of inotropes and the severity of the acute illness.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
J. M. Farfel, S. A. Franca, M. d. C. Sitta, W. J. Filho, and C. R. R. Carvalho
Age, invasive ventilatory support and outcomes in elderly patients admitted to intensive care units
Age Ageing, September 1, 2009; 38(5): 515 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med SciHome page
I. Sleiman, R. Rozzini, P. Barbisoni, A. Morandi, A. Ricci, A. Giordano, and M. Trabucchi
Functional Trajectories During Hospitalization: A Prognostic Sign for Elderly Patients
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, June 1, 2009; 64A(6): 659 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
A. Demoule, C. Cracco, Y. Lefort, P. Ray, J.-P. Derenne, and T. Similowski
Patients Aged 90 Years or Older in the Intensive Care Unit
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., January 1, 2005; 60(1): 129 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
J. M. Welton, A. A. Meyer, L. Mandelkehr, S. M. Fakhry, and S. Jarr
Outcomes of and Resource Consumption by High-Cost Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
Am. J. Crit. Care., September 1, 2002; 11(5): 467 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.