Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mead, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dennis, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mead, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dennis, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing, Vol 28, 441-446, Copyright © 1999 by British Geriatrics Society


ARTICLES

The influence of randomized trials on the use of anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation

GE Mead, JM Wardlaw, SC Lewis, M McDowall and MS Dennis
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, UK. GEM@skull.dcn.ed.ac.uk

INTRODUCTION: Anticoagulants and anti-platelet drugs have been shown in randomized trials to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We therefore investigated their use in patients known to be in AF before a stroke, transient ischaemic attack (either cerebral or ocular) or retinal artery occlusion to assess the influence of trials on clinical practice. METHODS: Inpatients and outpatients with acute stroke, transient ischaemic attack or retinal artery occlusion were prospectively identified by a stroke physician from 1990 to 1997. The presence or absence of AF before the vascular event, and prior use of anticoagulant and anti-platelet drugs were recorded at the time of the assessment and verified using information from general practitioner and hospital case notes. RESULTS: Of 1934 patients with stroke or retinal artery occlusion, 191 (10%) were in AF before their ischaemic event. Anticoagulants had been used in 40 (21%) of these, but only in 32 (2%) of the 1743 patients in sinus rhythm [odds ratio (OR) 14.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.6-23.2]. Anti-platelet drugs had been used in 62 (32%) of those with AF compared with 500 (30%) of those in sinus rhythm (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-1.64). Of the 161 patients in AF without contraindications to anticoagulants, only 36 (22%) were taking them. Although there was a statistically significant increase in anticoagulant use from 8% in 1990 to 23% in 1996, this could be explained solely by a fall in the age of the patients referred to our hospital. CONCLUSION: Anticoagulation is probably under-used in AF. We found no conclusive evidence that anticoagulation trials have influenced clinical practice. This raises issues about the dissemination and implementation of trial results.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
A. Rash, T. Downes, R. Portner, W. W. Yeo, N. Morgan, and K. S. Channer
A randomised controlled trial of warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in octogenarians with atrial fibrillation (WASPO)
Age Ageing, March 1, 2007; 36(2): 151 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J M Wardlaw
Recent developments in imaging of stroke
Imaging, October 1, 2002; 14(5): 409 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Stewart, K. MacIntyre, M.M.C. MacLeod, A.E.M. Bailey, S. Capewell, and J.J.V. McMurray
Trends in hospital activity, morbidity and case fatality related to atrial fibrillation in Scotland, 1986-1996
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2001; 22(8): 693 - 701.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.