Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orme, S.
Right arrow Articles by Channer, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Orme, S.
Right arrow Articles by Channer, K. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing, Vol 28, 537-542, Copyright © 1999 by British Geriatrics Society


ARTICLES

The normal range for inter-arm differences in blood pressure

S Orme, SG Ralph, A Birchall, P Lawson-Matthew, K McLean and KS Channer
Department of Cardiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

OBJECTIVE: to establish the mean and normal range for the difference in simultaneous systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements between the right and left arm. SUBJECTS: 462 subjects, age range 20-89 years, in sinus rhythm and with no history of stroke, 98 of whom had a history of cardiovascular disease or were taking vasoactive medication. METHODS: four simultaneous recordings of blood pressure in both arms were made using two automated sphygmomanometers with the subject supine after resting for 10 min. RESULTS: inter-arm systolic and diastolic blood pressure differences show a near normal distribution of values. Some individuals had clinically important differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure between their arms. The magnitude of these differences was not related to the mean baseline blood pressure. Linear regression analysis did not demonstrate any significant relationship between inter-arm systolic or diastolic blood pressure difference and age in patients of either sex. For systolic blood pressure the mean difference between the right and left arm was 1.1 mmHg and the normal range was -9 mmHg to 11 mmHg. For diastolic blood pressure the mean difference was 0 mmHg and the normal range -10 mmHg to 10 mmHg. CONCLUSION: the frequency of significant inter-arm systolic and diastolic blood pressure differences suggests that the blood pressure should be taken in both arms at the initial consultation. At subsequent visits, the arm in which measurements are taken should be recorded in the case notes. The higher of the two readings should be used to guide further management decisions.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. Agarwal, Z. Bunaye, and D. M. Bekele
Prognostic Significance of Between-Arm Blood Pressure Differences
Hypertension, March 1, 2008; 51(3): 657 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
K. Eguchi, M. Yacoub, J. Jhalani, W. Gerin, J. E. Schwartz, and T. G. Pickering
Consistency of Blood Pressure Differences Between the Left and Right Arms
Arch Intern Med, February 26, 2007; 167(4): 388 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. Karagiannis, K. Tziomalos, N. Krikis, G. Sfikas, K. Dona, and C. Zamboulis
The Unilateral Measurement of Blood Pressure May Mask the Diagnosis or Delay the Effective Treatment of Hypertension
Angiology, September 1, 2005; 56(5): 565 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Shadman, M. H. Criqui, W. P. Bundens, A. Fronek, J. O. Denenberg, A. C. Gamst, and M. M. McDermott
Subclavian artery stenosis: Prevalence, risk factors, and association with cardiovascular diseases
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2004; 44(3): 618 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.