Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fass, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sampliner, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fass, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sampliner, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing, Vol 29, 125-130, Copyright © 2000 by British Geriatrics Society


ARTICLES

Symptom severity and oesophageal chemosensitivity to acid in older and young patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux

R Fass, G Pulliam, C Johnson, H Garewal and R Sampliner
Sections of Gastroenterology, Biometry and Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Tucson VA Medical Center and Arizona Health Sciences Center, 3601 S 6th Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85723, USA; Corresponding author; Fax: (+1) 520 629 4737; E-mail: Ronnie.Fass@Med.VA.gov

Introduction. Elderly patients appear to have a more aggressive form of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease than younger patients. Reduced pain perception with age is a possible underlying mechanism.Aims. To compare the extent of oesophageal mucosal injury, acid exposure, symptom severity and perception thresholds for acid infusion in older (aged 60 or older) and younger patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux.Method. Twenty-five younger and 23 older patients completed the study. We determined acid exposure and oesophageal mucosal injury by ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring and upper endoscopy, respectively. We determined chemosensitivity by infusing 0.1 N hydrochloric acid into the mid-oesophagus for 10 min at 10 ml/min after a 2-min infusion of normal saline at a similar rate. We quantified acid perception thresholds by the lag time to initial typical symptom perception, intensity rating at the end of acid infusion and an acid perfusion sensitivity score, calculated from the fractional duration of symptom perception and intensity rating.Results. Mean percentage of total time with pH <4 was higher in the older (15.8 2.4) than in the younger patients (11.9 1.8; P0.18). Of the older group, 74% had erosive oesophagitis versus 64% in the younger group. Frequency of symptoms (heartburn, acid regurgitation and dysphagia) was lower in the elderly group. Older patients perceived heartburn and acid regurgitation as much less severe than younger patients (P<0.05). Younger patients had a significantly shorter lag time to initial symptom perception (P<0.05) and a higher sensory intensity rating (P<0.08). The acid perfusion sensitivity score was significantly lower in the older group (P<0.05).Conclusion. Older patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease have reduced symptom severity for heartburn despite a tendency towards increased severity of oesophageal mucosal injury and acid exposure. Age-related reduction in chemosensitivity to acid is a possible underlying mechanism.Keywords: elderly patients, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, oesophageal chemosensitivity, symptom severity
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
A. I. Sarela, D. G. Hick, C. S. Verbeke, J. F. Casey, P. J. Guillou, and G. W. B. Clark
Persistent Acid and Bile Reflux in Asymptomatic Patients With Barrett Esophagus Receiving Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy
Arch Surg, May 1, 2004; 139(5): 547 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.