Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Barer, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Barer, D. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing 2000; 29: 511-515
© 2000, British Geriatrics Society


Research papers

Development and validation of a brief observer-rated screening scale for depression in elderly medical patients

Margaret F. Hammond, Shaun T. O'Keeffe1 and David H. Barer2

Geriatric Medicine, University Clinical Department, The Duncan Building, Daulby Street, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK
1 Department of Geriatric Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Dun Laoghaire, County Dublin, Republic of Ireland
2 Department of Clinical Geriatric Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Sheriff Hill, Gateshead, County Durham NE9 65X, UK

Abstract

Objective: to develop a depression screening scale that does not rely on verbal communication.

Setting: an acute geriatric unit in a teaching hospital.

Subjects: 96 patients (mean age 81 years, range 68–92, 59 women); 40% of the initial study group of 50 and 22% of the validation group of 46 were diagnosed as depressed.

Methods: we devised a scale using nine items which could be rated by an observer; we determined inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for each item compared with a Geriatric Mental State-AGECAT diagnosis of depression; we validated a final scale of six items.

Results: inter-rater reliability was poor for two items (irritability and sleep disturbance) while two items (sleep disturbance and night sedation) had poor sensitivity; we omitted these items in a revised scale. Re-analysis of data from the initial study showed that a cut-off of >=3 on the revised scale gave a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 0.89 and a negative predictive value of 0.90. Spearman's correlation coefficient between the six-item questionnaire and the Hamilton rating scale was 0.79. In the validation study, the cut-off score of >=3 on the revised six-item scale had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 72%, a positive predictive value of 0.69 and a negative predictive value of 0.96.

Conclusions: this simple, short, observation-based screening scale completed by nurses is sensitive and specific in identifying depression in elderly medically ill patients, and may be a useful addition to clinical practice.

Keywords: depression, older people, screening scales


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GerontologistHome page
S. M. Friedman, D. A. Mendelson, K. W. Bingham, and R. M. McCann
Hazards of Hospitalization: Residence Prior to Admission Predicts Outcomes
Gerontologist, August 1, 2008; 48(4): 537 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
R. J. Woolley, J. B. Young, J. R. Green, and D. J. Brooker
The feasibility of care mapping to improve care for physically ill older people in hospital
Age Ageing, July 1, 2008; 37(4): 390 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. Townend, M. Brady, and K. McLaughlan
A Systematic Evaluation of the Adaptation of Depression Diagnostic Methods for Stroke Survivors Who Have Aphasia
Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 3076 - 3083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L Leeds, R J Meara, and J P Hobson
The utility of the Stroke Aphasia Depression Questionnaire (SADQ) in a stroke rehabilitation unit
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2004; 18(2): 228 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.