Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (44)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krska, J.
Right arrow Articles by Seymour, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krska, J.
Right arrow Articles by Seymour, D. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing 2001; 30: 205-211
© 2001, British Geriatrics Society


Research papers

Pharmacist-led medication review in patients over 65: a randomized, controlled trial in primary care

Janet Krska, John A. Cromarty, Fiona Arris, Debbie Jamieson, Denise Hansford, Peter R. S. Duffus1, George Downie2 and D. Gwyn Seymour3

School of Pharmacy, The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
1 Albyn Medical Practice, Aberdeen, UK
2 Grampian Primary Care Trust, Woodend Hospital, Aberdeen, UK
3 Department of Medicine for the Elderly, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

Abstract

Background: regular medication review has been recommended for those over 75 and those on multiple drug therapy. Pharmacists are a potential source of assistance in reviewing medication. Evidence of the benefits of this process is needed.

Objective: to study the effect of medication review led by a pharmacist on resolution of pharmaceutical care issues, medicine costs, use of health and social services and health-related quality of life.

Design: randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: general medical practices in the Grampian region of Scotland.

Subjects: patients aged at least 65 years, with at least two chronic disease states who were taking at least four prescribed medicines regularly.

Methods: pharmacists reviewed the drug therapy of 332 patients, using information obtained from the practice computer, medical records and patient interviews. In 168 patients, a pharmaceutical care plan was then drawn up and implemented. The 164 control patients continued to receive normal care. All outcome measures were assessed at baseline and after 3 months.

Results: all patients had at least two pharmaceutical care issues at baseline. Half of these were identified from the prescription record, the rest from notes and patient interview. Of all the issues, 21% were resolved by information found in notes and 8.5% by patient interview. General practitioners agreed with 96% of all care issues documented on the care plans in the intervention group. At the time of follow-up, 70% of the remaining care issues had been resolved in the intervention group, while only 14% had been resolved in the control group. There were no changes in medicine costs or health-related quality of life in either group. There were small increases in contacts with health-care professionals and slightly fewer hospital admissions among the intervention group than the control group.

Conclusions: pharmacist-led medication review has the capacity to identify and resolve pharmaceutical care issues and may have some impact on the use of other health services.

Keywords: medication-related problems, medication review, pharmaceutical care, pharmacist


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
D. M. Triller and R. A. Hamilton
Effect of pharmaceutical care services on outcomes for home care patients with heart failure
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., November 1, 2007; 64(21): 2244 - 2249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
M. Machado, J. Bajcar, G. C Guzzo, and T. R Einarson
Sensitivity of Patient Outcomes to Pharmacist Interventions. Part II: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Hypertension Management
Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2007; 41(11): 1770 - 1781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
E. Lenaghan, R. Holland, and A. Brooks
Home-based medication review in a high risk elderly population in primary care--the POLYMED randomised controlled trial
Age Ageing, May 1, 2007; 36(3): 292 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
A. M. Peterson
Improving adherence in patients with alcohol dependence: A new role for pharmacists
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., March 1, 2007; 64(5_Supplement_3): S23 - S29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
A S. Pickard and S.-Y. Hung
An Update on Evidence of Clinical Pharmacy Services' Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life
Ann. Pharmacother., September 1, 2006; 40(9): 1623 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
C J Morris, J A Cantrill, A J Avery, and R L Howard
Preventing drug related morbidity: a process for facilitating changes in practice.
Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 116 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
S Royal, L Smeaton, A J Avery, B Hurwitz, and A Sheikh
Interventions in primary care to reduce medication related adverse events and hospital admissions: systematic review and meta-analysis
Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 23 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M E. McDermott, B. H Smith, A. M Elliott, C. M Bond, P. C Hannaford, and W A. Chambers
The use of medication for chronic pain in primary care, and the potential for intervention by a practice-based pharmacist
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2006; 23(1): 46 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
P. E. Muijrers, R. P. Grol, J. Sijbrandij, R. Janknegt, and J A. Knottnerus
Differences in prescribing between GPs. Impact of the cooperation with pharmacists and impact of visits from pharmaceutical industry representatives
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2005; 22(6): 624 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
W. van Lankveld, M. Franssen, and A. Stenger
Gerontorheumatology: the challenge to meet health-care demands for the elderly with musculoskeletal conditions
Rheumatology, April 1, 2005; 44(4): 419 - 422.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
R. Holland, E. Lenaghan, I. Harvey, R. Smith, L. Shepstone, A. Lipp, M. Christou, D. Evans, and C. Hand
Does home based medication review keep older people out of hospital? The HOMER randomised controlled trial
BMJ, February 5, 2005; 330(7486): 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
K. B Farris, J. M Ganther-Urmie, G. Fang, W. R Doucette, J. M Brooks, D. G Klepser, D. J Fries, and C. L Kuhle
Population-Based Medication Reviews: A Descriptive Analysis of the Medication Issues Identified in a Medicare Not-for-Profit Prescription Discount Program
Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2004; 38(11): 1823 - 1829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
J. F. van Mil, L. T. Westerlund, K. E Hersberger, and M. A Schaefer
Drug-Related Problem Classification Systems
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2004; 38(5): 859 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
J. Sellors, J. Kaczorowski, C. Sellors, L. Dolovich, C. Woodward, A. Willan, R. Goeree, R. Cosby, K. Trim, R. Sebaldt, et al.
A randomized controlled trial of a pharmacist consultation program for family physicians and their elderly patients
Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 8, 2003; 169(1): 17 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
S. R. Majumdar and S. B. Soumerai
Why most interventions to improve physician prescribing do not seem to work
Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 8, 2003; 169(1): 30 - 31.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.