Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowling, A.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowling, A.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing 2002; 31: 187-192
© 2002, British Geriatrics Society


Research papers

Are older people willing to give up their place in the queue for cardiac surgery to a younger person?

Ann Bowling, Aldo Mariotto1 and Olga Evans2

Centre for Ageing Population Studies, University College London, UK ,*
1 Community Medicine Service, Health Authority No. 6, Friuli Occidentale, Padova, Italy
2 Omnibus Survey, Social Survey Division, Office for National Statistics, London, UK

Abstract

Objectives: to measure whether people aged 65 and over living in Britain would be willing to give up their place on the cardiac surgery waiting list for someone younger than them.

Methods: two British surveys, based on random types of people sampled for the Office for National Statistics Omnibus Surveys, identified respondents aged 65 and over for a module on waiting lists. They were asked to imagine they had a heart condition that required surgery, and that they were on an NHS waiting list. They were then asked if they would be prepared to give up their place on the cardiac surgery waiting list to a younger person (aged 45). The study compared responses to one of two relative waiting list time frames (6 and 12 months).

Setting: two national random samples of the British public aged 65 and over.

Results: fifty eight per cent and 62% of Omnibus respondents aged 65 and over responded that it was not right to give up their place on the cardiac surgery waiting list for someone younger in relation to a 6 and 12 month wait respectively. Thirty seven per cent and 34% of each group of Omnibus respondents aged 65+ said it was right to give up their place on the cardiac surgery waiting list for someone younger than them, in relation to a 6 and 12 month relative waiting period respectively. Thus the length of the wait had little effect on response among British respondents. The proportions who were willing to cede priority are far less than that reported in a comparable Italian survey. Consistent with the Italian survey, willingness to cede priority increased with age.

Conclusions: most older people in Britain do not wish to cede priority on the waiting list for cardiac surgery to people younger than themselves, although willingness to give up one's place increased with age. The specific time frame did not have an impact on people's responses.

The increase in willingness to cede priority with older age could be interpreted as older people valuing themselves less, or that they feel that they have had their ‘fair innings’ and are willing to give younger people the chance of reaching their age. It could even reflect a cohort effect. It is likely that ageing ‘baby boomers’ may be even less willing to give up their place in the health service queue and will be more assertive about their right to equity in health care provision.

Keywords: cardiology, elderly people, rationing, waiting lists


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
A Mariotto, M Dello Buono, and D De Leo
Elderly people and the public health service: a much desirable marriage
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, July 1, 2003; 57(7): 525 - 526.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.