Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burleigh, E.
Right arrow Articles by Davie, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burleigh, E.
Right arrow Articles by Davie, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing 2002; 31: 303-306
© 2002, British Geriatrics Society

Short Report

Can doctors predict patients' abbreviated mental test scores

Elizabeth Burleigh, Ian Reeves2, Christine McAlpine and James Davie1

Department of Medicine, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock KA2 0BE, UK
1 Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Stobhill Hospital, Glasgow, UK
2 Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK

Abstract

Objectives: the abbreviated mental test is widely used in the assessment of cognitive impairment in elderly patients. However, many doctors do not administer the full 10 questions, preferring to estimate the patient's score instead. We have studied the accuracy of doctors in predicting patients’ abbreviated mental test scores.

Methods: we assessed 102 patients in the geriatric unit. We asked doctors to predict the patient's abbreviated mental test during the admission interview. A true abbreviated mental test was then recorded.

Results: mean age was 80.9 years with a male:female ratio of 27:74. The mean predicted abbreviated mental test score was 6.57 (SD 2.9); the mean actual abbreviated mental test score being 6.36 (SD 3.2). Comparing the two groups, abbreviated mental test scores were predicted most accurately at the extremes and correlation between the two groups of scores was high (P<0.001 Spearman test). Kappa statistics revealed moderate agreement between the two groups, (0.56, 95% CI 0.48–0.63). A predicted score of 5/10 showed the greatest spread of true abbreviated mental test scores (0–10, mean 4.5). However in total, only 31% of the predicted abbreviated mental test scores were accurate, with 42% being incorrect by >1. Using the accepted cut-off of <7/10, this revealed that 13% were underdiagnosed and 19% were overdiagnosed as being cognitively impaired.

Conclusions: clinicians are poor at predicting abbreviated mental tests in the midrange but are more accurate at predicting lower and higher scores. This descriptive study reinforces the importance of using an objective assessment of cognitive impairment rather than clinicians estimating its presence or absence.

Keywords: abbreviated mental test, cognitive assessment, cognitive impairment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 QJMHome page
H.J. Woodford and J. George
Cognitive assessment in the elderly: a review of clinical methods
QJM, August 1, 2007; 100(8): 469 - 484.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.