Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rothera, I.
Right arrow Articles by Waite, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rothera, I.
Right arrow Articles by Waite, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing 2003; 32: 303-309
© 2003, British Geriatrics Society


Research paper

Health status and assessed need for a cohort of older people admitted to nursing and residential homes

Ian Rothera1,, Rob Jones1, Rowan Harwood2, Anthony Avery3 and Jonathan Waite1

1 Section of Old Age Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, A-Floor, South Block, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
2 Directorate of Health Care of the Elderly, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
3 Division of General Practice, School of Community Health Sciences, The Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK

Abstract

Objective: to investigate dependency and health status of a cohort of older people admitted for long term nursing or residential care and to compare these findings with assessments conducted by social services departments prior to placement.

Design: retrospective cohort study.

Setting: residential, nursing and dual registered homes within Nottingham Health Authority boundaries.

Subjects: 205 residents placed over 3 months.

Main outcome measures: levels of disability, cognitive impairment and behavioural disturbance identified by assessment before and after admission.

Results: cognitive impairment and physical disability were significantly higher in nursing homes, although a third of residents in residential care had substantial physical disability. In nursing homes, a quarter of residents had low dependency needs but these had greater cognitive impairment than those in residential homes with the same level of dependency. Most residents had some degree of behavioural disturbance (particularly in nursing homes) and more severe disturbance was associated with greater cognitive impairment and more depressed mood, but not physical disability. A moderate level of agreement was found between preadmission and follow-up assessments of health status.

Conclusions: a case-mix which includes higher dependency residents in residential homes and lower dependency residents in nursing homes is likely to reflect changes in the health status of residents following placement but also suggests that a range of placement criteria were used together, rather than individual indicators of need. Although pre-placement measures of disability and dependency were supported by follow-up assessments, it is essential that the needs of residents in long-term care are adequately monitored and managed, in particular those in residential care with higher dependency needs.

Keywords: assessment, needs, nursing/residential care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
N. Brittle, S. Patel, C. Wright, S. Baral, P. Versfeld, and C. Sackley
An exploratory cluster randomized controlled trial of group exercise on mobility and depression in care home residents
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2009; 23(2): 146 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.