Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Challiner, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Challiner, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing 2003; 32: 343-346
© 2003, British Geriatrics Society

Short report

Performance indicators for hospital services for older people

Yvonne Challiner1,, G. Iain Carpenter2, Jonathan Potter3 and Colleen Maxwell4

East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust, Kent, UK
1 Queen Elizabeth Queen Mother Hospital, St Peter's Road, Margate, Kent CT9 4AN, UK
2 Centre for Health Services Studies, George Allen Wing, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
3 Kent and Canterbury Hospital, Ethelbert Road, Canterbury, UK
4 University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Abstract

Background: standardised assessment is recommended in geriatric practice to improve patient care and generate quality data for audit and research. High level indicators used to measure performance of rehabilitation units suggested that more patients were discharged to long-term residential care from one of two hospitals in a Health Authority in South East England.

Objectives: to test whether the information provided by standardised assessment could inform performance indicators used to compare outcomes between hospitals.

Design: prospective observational study.

Subjects: consecutive patients admitted for rehabilitation to two general geriatric rehabilitation wards in each of two nearby district general hospitals.

Methods: patients were assessed using standard tools (Barthel and Abbreviated Mental Test score) and various scales of the interRAI MDS assessment system (mental and physical functioning, pressure ulcers, continence, falls, mood), within a week of admission and up to one week before discharge. Place of residence prior to admission and discharge destination were determined.

Results: on bivariate analysis there was a significant difference in discharge to residential and nursing homes between hospitals. Results from multivariate logistic regression analysis showed an increased risk for institutionalisation at discharge for women [odds ratio 2.42 (95% CI 1.41–4.14)] and patients with impaired cognitive function [odds ratio 1.53 (95% CI 1.28–1.82) for each point increase in MDS cognitive performance scale] and physical function [odds ratio 1.15 (95% CI 1.08–1.22) for each point increase in MDS short ADL scale]. Barthel and Abbreviated Mental Test showed similar odds ratios. Hospital did not remain a significant predictor of discharge destination following adjustment for patients' physical and cognitive function.

Conclusions: comparisons of outcomes between hospitals could be misleading unless informed by standardised data on physical and mental functioning of rehabilitation patients.

Keywords: standardised assessment, rehabilitation, performance indicators, case-mix


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.