Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Auyeung, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Auyeung, T. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing 2003; 32: 388-393
© 2003, British Geriatrics Society


Research Papers

A comparison of two feeding methods in the alleviation of diarrhoea in older tube-fed patients: a randomised controlled trial

Jenny Shun Wah Lee and Tung Wai Auyeung

Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong, China

Abstract

Objective: to compare the effect of two feeding methods on older tube-fed patients suffering from diarrhoea.

Design: randomised controlled study.

Setting: geriatric wards in a regional hospital.

Subjects: 105 patients over the age of 60 who developed diarrhoea while on intermittent bolus tube feeding.

Methods: subjects were randomised either to switch to continuous tube feeding or to continue with intermittent bolus tube feeding for 3 days, with some extended to 5 days. Incontinence pads were inspected 6 times per day by independent observers. Each motion was evaluated using a validated score according to its volume and consistency. Stools were sent for pathogen culture and Clostridium difficile cytotoxin assay. Those with positive assays were excluded from analysis. Gastric aspirations were performed at regular intervals and significant residual volumes recorded.

Results: 86 patients completed the study. Twelve patients (14%) were excluded due to positive CD stool assays. Seventy-four patients were entered into analysis. The median diarrhoea scores of the continuous infusion group and the intermittent bolus group were: day 0 (12 versus 10, P=0.18), day 3 (4 versus 6, P=0.23) and day 5 (5 versus 4, P=0.83) respectively. There was no statistical difference between the two groups. Two patients in the continuous infusion group (n=37) and 4 patients in the intermittent bolus group (n=37) had significant gastric residual volumes. The incidence did not differ significantly.

Conclusion: contrary to common belief and recommendation, we could not find a significant difference between the continuous feeding method and the intermittent feeding method in the alleviation of diarrhoea in tube-fed patients. We do not recommend routine switch to continuous pump feeding in the management of tube-fed patients suffering from diarrhoea.

Keywords: older adults, tube feeding, diarrhoea, randomised


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
N. A. Metheny, L. Schallom, D. A. Oliver, and R. E. Clouse
Gastric Residual Volume and Aspiration in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Gastric Feedings
Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2008; 17(6): 512 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
M. Melis, A. Fichera, and M. K. Ferguson
Bowel Necrosis Associated With Early Jejunal Tube Feeding--Reply
Arch Surg, January 1, 2007; 142(1): 101 - 101.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.