Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gray, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by O’Connell, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gray, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by O’Connell, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing 2004; 33: 71-77
© 2004, British Geriatrics Society


Research Paper

Prevalence and prediction of unrecognised diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance following acute stroke

Christopher S. Gray1, Jon F. Scott1, Joyce M. French2, K. G. M. M. Alberti3 and Janice E. O’Connell1

1 Newcastle University Department of Medicine for the Elderly, F Floor, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Kayll Road, Sunderland SR4 7TP, UK
2 Departments of Statistics
3 Departments of Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK

Address correspondence to: C. S. Gray. Fax: (+44) 191 569 9767. Email: chris.gray{at}chs.northy.nhs.uk

Abstract

Background: diabetes mellitus not only increases the risk of ischaemic stroke two- to four-fold but also adversely inXuences prognosis. The prevalence of recognised diabetes mellitus in acute stroke patients is between 8 and 20%, but between 6 and 42% of patients may have undiagnosed diabetes mellitus before presentation. Post-stroke hyperglycaemia is frequent and of limited diagnostic value and the oral glucose tolerance test assumes that the patient is clinically stable and eating normally. There is a need for a simple and reliable method to predict new diabetes mellitus in acute stroke patients.

Objectives: to determine the prevalence of unrecognised diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance on hospital admission and 12 weeks later in acute stroke patients with post-stroke hyperglycaemia >=6.1 mmol/l. To measure the accuracy of hyperglycaemia and elevated glycosylated haemoglobin concentration in predicting the presence of unrecognised diabetes mellitus at 12 weeks.

Design: acute (<24 hours) stroke patients (cerebral infarction and primary intracerebral haemorrhage) with admission hyperglycaemia between 6.0 and 17 mmol/l and without a previous history of insulin-treated diabetes mellitus who were randomised into the Glucose Insulin in Stroke Trial between October 1997 and May 1999 were studied. The Glucose Insulin in Stroke Trial is a randomised controlled trial investigating the benefits of maintaining euglycaemia in acute stroke patients with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia. At 12 weeks, survivors underwent a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of admission plasma glucose >=6.1 mmol/l and elevated glycosylated haemoglobin concentration in predicting the presence of diabetes mellitus were used to estimate the prevalence of unrecognised diabetes mellitus in a consecutive series of 582 acute stroke admissions.

Results: 582 consecutive acute stroke patients were assessed for eligibility for the Glucose Insulin Stroke Trial, of whom 83 (14%) had recognised diabetes mellitus. One hundred and forty-two patients were randomised and 62 underwent a 3-month oral glucose tolerance test, of whom 26 (42%) had normal glucose tolerance, 23 (37%) had impaired glucose tolerance and 13 (21%) had diabetes mellitus. Admission plasma glucose >=6.1 mmol/l and glycosylated haemoglobin >=6.2% predicted the presence of previously unrecognised diabetes mellitus at 12 weeks with a positive predictive value of 80% and negative predictive value of 96%. The estimated prevalence of unrecognised diabetes mellitus in the total series of acute stroke admissions was 16–24%.

Conclusions: one-third of all acute stroke patients may have diabetes mellitus. For patients presenting with post-stroke hyperglycaemia, impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes mellitus is present in two-thirds of survivors at 12 weeks. Admission plasma glucose >=6.1 mmol/l combined with glycosylated haemoglobin >=6.2% are good predictors of the presence of diabetes mellitus following stroke.

Keywords: stroke, diabetes mellitus, oral glucose tolerance test, elderly

Received January 14, 2003; Revision received July 30, 2003. accepted in revised form July 30, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
N. Kostulas, I. Markaki, H. Cansu, T. Masterman, and V. Kostulas
Hyperglycaemia in acute ischaemic stroke is associated with an increased 5-year mortality
Age Ageing, September 1, 2009; 38(5): 590 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T. Urabe, H. Watada, Y. Okuma, R. Tanaka, Y. Ueno, N. Miyamoto, Y. Tanaka, N. Hattori, and R. Kawamori
Prevalence of Abnormal Glucose Metabolism and Insulin Resistance Among Subtypes of Ischemic Stroke in Japanese Patients
Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1289 - 1295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. T. McCormick, K. W. Muir, C. S. Gray, and M. R. Walters
Management of Hyperglycemia in Acute Stroke: How, When, and for Whom?
Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): 2177 - 2185.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A.-C. Jonsson, I. Lindgren, B. Norrving, and A. Lindgren
Weight Loss After Stroke: A Population-Based Study From the Lund Stroke Register
Stroke, March 1, 2008; 39(3): 918 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
L. Allport, T. Baird, K. Butcher, L. MacGregor, J. Prosser, P. Colman, and S. Davis
Frequency and Temporal Profile of Poststroke Hyperglycemia Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2006; 29(8): 1839 - 1844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes and Vascular Disease ResearchHome page
N. Asfandiyarova, N. Kolcheva, I. Ryazantsev, and V. Ryazantsev
Risk factors for stroke in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, May 1, 2006; 3(1): 57 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
K. Matz, K. Keresztes, C. Tatschl, M. Nowotny, A. Dachenhausen, M. Brainin, and J. Tuomilehto
Disorders of Glucose Metabolism in Acute Stroke Patients: An underrecognized problem
Diabetes Care, April 1, 2006; 29(4): 792 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
F. Vancheri, M. Curcio, A. Burgio, S. Salvaggio, G. Gruttadauria, M.C. Lunetta, R. Dovico, and M. Alletto
Impaired glucose metabolism in patients with acute stroke and no previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
QJM, December 1, 2005; 98(12): 871 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
T. M Conner, K. R Flesner-Gurley, and J. C Barner
Hyperglycemia in the Hospital Setting: The Case for Improved Control Among Non-Diabetics
Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2005; 39(3): 492 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. E. Allport, K. S. Butcher, T. A. Baird, L. MacGregor, P. M. Desmond, B. M. Tress, P. Colman, and S. M. Davis
Insular Cortical Ischemia Is Independently Associated With Acute Stress Hyperglycemia
Stroke, August 1, 2004; 35(8): 1886 - 1891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Bhalla, D. Hargroves, A. Rudd, C. S. Gray, and J. E. O'Connell
Poststroke Hyperglycemia Management: More Answers Required * Response
Stroke, July 1, 2004; 35(7): e341 - e342.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.