Age and Ageing 2004; 33: 165-170
© 2004, British Geriatrics Society
Research Paper |
Dignity in older age: what do older people in the United Kingdom think?
1 Department of Social Medicine,
2 Medical Research Council Health Services Research Collaboration, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK
3 Academic Department of Geriatric Medicine, UWCM Academic Centre, Llandough Hospital, Penlan Road, Cardiff CF64 2XX, UK
Address correspondence to: G. Woolhead. Fax: (+44) 117 928 7236. Email: gill.woolhead{at}bristol.ac.uk
Abstract
Background: dignity is a complex concept and there is little empirical research to show how older people view dignity. This study, using qualitative methods, explored the concept of dignity from the older person’s perspective.
Methods: 15 focus groups and two individual interviews were conducted in 12 different settings, with a total of 72 participants. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure a mix of socio-economic status, ethnicity, gender, age (65+) and level of fitness. Focus groups were audio-taped and transcribed. The method of constant comparison was used to analyse the data.
Results: there was strong evidence to suggest that dignity was salient to the concerns of older people. Dignity was seen as a multi-faceted concept: (i) dignity of identity (self-respect/esteem, integrity, trust); (ii) human rights (equality, choice); and (iii) autonomy (independence, control). Examples of dignity being jeopardised rather than being enhanced were given. A loss of self-esteem arose from being patronised, excluded from decision-making, and being treated as an ‘object’. Lack of integrity in society meant that there was an inability to trust others and an increased vulnerability. Equality was an important issue but many felt that government policies did not support their rights.
Conclusions: this work identifies the different ways dignity is conceptualised by older people. The evidence showed that person centred care for older people needs to be specifically related to communication, privacy, personal identity and feelings of vulnerability. It provides evidence for policy makers and professionals to tailor policies and practices to the needs of the older person.
Keywords: dignity, older age, qualitative research
Received March 19, 2003; Revision received September 22, 2003. accepted in revised form September 22, 2003.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Brady Hospitalized Children's vIews of the Good Nurse Nursing Ethics, September 1, 2009; 16(5): 543 - 560. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Vanlaere, F. Bouckaert, and C. Gastmans Care for suicidal older people: current clinical-ethical considerations J. Med. Ethics, July 1, 2007; 33(7): 376 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. E T McMurdo and M. D Witham Health and welfare of older people in care homes BMJ, May 5, 2007; 334(7600): 913 - 914. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Pleschberger Dignity and the challenge of dying in nursing homes: the residents' view Age Ageing, March 1, 2007; 36(2): 197 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L Yardley, M Donovan-Hall, K Francis, and C Todd Older people's views of advice about falls prevention: a qualitative study Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2006; 21(4): 508 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 23 Apr 2004 to 23 Jul 2004 Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2004; 7(4): e4 - e4. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T Smith Exploring the motivation of patients and professionals and ways in which information might support a change in the relationships between them Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2004; 13(3): 235 - 238. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|