Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miskelly, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miskelly, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing 2004; 33: 304-306
Age and Ageing Vol. 33 No. 3 © British Geriatrics Society 2004; all rights reserved


Short Report

A novel system of electronic tagging in patients with dementia and wandering

Frank Miskelly

Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK. Fax: (+44) 208 846 1307. Email: f.miskelly{at}ic.ac.uk

Abstract

Background: wandering is a common problem in people with dementia. Current methods of physical or chemical restraint have serious adverse effects. Previous attempts at electronic tagging have been unsuccessful because of inadequacy of the technology.

Methods: this study tested equipment, derived from prisoner tagging systems, in three different scenarios: for 4 weeks in two wards at a large teaching hospital, 6 months in a medium sized residential home and 8 weeks in clients’ own homes in the community. In the hospital setting five clients, in the residential home four clients and in the community three clients wore an electronic bracelet for the duration of the study.

Results and conclusions: the system proved very reliable and two incidences of external wandering were successfully detected. Compliance was excellent. Ethical issues regarding the tagging of confused elderly people were raised by professional organisations but were not considered a contra-indication by the relatives, clients and staff.

Keywords: electronic tagging, aged, dementia

Received May 12, 2003; Revision received December 4, 2003. accepted in revised form December 4, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.