Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on June 13, 2006
Age and Ageing 2006 35(5):487-491; doi:10.1093/ageing/afl049
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive geriatric assessment and home-based rehabilitation for elderly people with a history of recurrent non-elective hospital admissions
1 Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK
2 Department of Physiotherapy, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
3 Greater Glasgow Primary Health Care Division, Glasgow, UK
4 Department of Occupational Therapy, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
Address correspondence to: D. J. Stott, Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, 3rd floor Centre Block, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK. Tel: (+44) 141 211 4976. Fax: (+44) 141 211 4944. Email: d.j.stott{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Objective: to determine whether a co-ordinated programme of geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary home-based rehabilitation reduces disability and prevents non-elective hospital readmission in high-risk elderly patients.
Design: nested casecontrol study comparing usual post-discharge care versus usual care plus a comprehensive geriatric assessment and home-based rehabilitation service, comprising nursing, occupational therapy and physiotherapy with geriatric medical review. Patients were
65 years with
2 non-elective hospital admissions within the previous 12 months. Disability was assessed using the 100-point Barthel index and Nottingham extended activities of daily living (EADL) score. Non-elective hospital admissions were recorded over 1-year follow-up.
Results: we studied 84 patients; 56 receiving the new service were matched to 28 controls. Intervention subjects received a median of 19 h [interquartile range (IQR) (7,35)] rehabilitation over 19 [IQR (6,42)] domiciliary visits. At 3 months, there was improvement in median Barthel and Nottingham EADL scores in the intervention group of 3 and 2 points, respectively, compared with reductions in controls of 3 and 6 points (both P<0.001, changes in intervention group versus controls); similar differences persisted in survivors at 12 months. There was a non-significant trend for reduction in the proportion of patients with further non-elective hospital admission in the intervention group (36/56, 64%) compared with controls (21/28, 75%; OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.34, 1.46).
Conclusions: a co-ordinated programme of geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary home-based rehabilitation reduced disability in elderly patients at high risk for non-elective hospital admission. Further research is required to determine whether this approach can reduce the need for hospital admission.
Keywords: comprehensive geriatric assessment, rehabilitation, disability, hospital admission, elderly
Received September 13, 2005; accepted in revised form April 5, 2006.