Skip Navigation


Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on September 2, 2006
Age and Ageing 2006 35(6):607-614; doi:10.1093/ageing/afl100
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/6/607    most recent
afl100v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowling, A.
Right arrow Articles by Iliffe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowling, A.
Right arrow Articles by Iliffe, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Which model of successful ageing should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal survey of ageing

Ann Bowling and Steve Iliffe

Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, Hampstead Campus, London NW3 2PF, UK

Address correspondence to: A. Bowling. Tel: (+44) 0207 830 2239. Email: a.bowling{at}ucl.ac.uk

Background: there is increasing interest in how to age ‘successfully’ and in reaching consensus over its definition.

Objective: to assess different models of successful ageing, using a British longitudinal survey of ageing in 2000–1.

Setting: community settings in Britain.

Methods: five models of successful ageing were tested on a British cross-sectional population survey of 999 people aged 65+. The models were biomedical, broader biomedical, social, psychological and lay based.

Results: the lay model emerged as the strongest. Respondents who were classified as successfully aged with this model, compared with those not successfully aged, had over five times the odds of rating their quality of life (QoL) as good rather than not good [odds ratio (OR) = 5.493, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 2.655–11.364].

Conclusion: the lay-based, more multidimensional, model of successful ageing predicted perceived QoL more powerfully than unidimensional models and should be used to evaluate the outcomes of health promotion in older populations.

Keywords: successful ageing, physical functioning, mental functioning, social functioning, health status, well-being, quality of life, elderly


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 West J Nurs ResHome page
G. Low, A. E. Molzahn, and M. Kalfoss
Quality of Life of Older Adults in Canada and Norway: Examining the Iowa Model
West J Nurs Res, June 1, 2008; 30(4): 458 - 476.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Age AgeingHome page
A. H. Laybourne, S. Biggs, and F. C. Martin
Falls exercise interventions and reduced falls rate: Always in the patient's interest?
Age Ageing, January 1, 2008; 37(1): 10 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.