Skip Navigation

Age and Ageing 2006 35(Supplement 2):ii27-ii31; doi:10.1093/ageing/afl081
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Augat, P.
Right arrow Articles by Schorlemmer, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Augat, P.
Right arrow Articles by Schorlemmer, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Mechanistic and Physiological Aspect

The role of cortical bone and its microstructure in bone strength

Peter Augat1 and Sandra Schorlemmer2

1 Trauma Centre Murnau, Prof. Kuentscher Strasse 8, 82418 Murnau, Germany
2 Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstrasse 14, 89081 Ulm, Germany

Address correspondence to: P. Augat. Tel: (+49) 8841 484563; Fax: (+49) 8841 484573. Email: biomechanik{at}bgu-murnau.de

Bone’s mechanical competence and its fragility in particular depend to a certain extent on the structure and microstructure of the cortical bone compartment. Beyond bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content, a variety of other features of cortical bone contribute to whole bone’s resistance to fracture. Structural properties of cortical bone most commonly employed as surrogate for its mechanical competence include thickness of the cortex, cortical cross-sectional area and area moment of inertia. But microstructural properties such as cortical porosity, crystallinity or the presence of microcracks also contribute to bone’s mechanical competence. Microcracks in particular not only weaken the cortical bone tissue but also provide an effective mechanism for energy dissipation. Bone is a damageable, viscoelastic composite and most of all a living material capable of self-repair and thus exhibits a complex repertoire of mechanical properties. This review provides an overview of a variety of features of cortical bone known to provide mechanical competence and how these features may be applied for fracture risk prediction.

Keywords: cortical bone, osteoporosis, microcracks, remodelling, biomechanics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.