Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on December 18, 2006
Age and Ageing 2007 36(2):184-189; doi:10.1093/ageing/afl146
Prognosis assessment in stroke patients at discharge from hospital
1 Uppsala University, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology Section, Uppsala, Sweden
2 Centre for Clinical Research, Dalarna, Sweden
3 Linköping University, Department of Health and Society, General, Practice, Linköping, Sweden
Address correspondence to: L. Olai. Tel: +462318316 Fax: +462318375. Email: lena.olai{at}Ltdalarna.se
Background: accurate prognostic assessments of need of help, health and dwelling situation in stroke patients are important for patient management, rehabilitation, discharge planning, and for providing reliable information to patients and their relatives.
Objective: to analyse factors affecting the accuracy of discharge prognosis assessments.
Design: prospective study of stroke patients discharged from hospital.
Setting: two cities in central Sweden.
Subjects: three hundred and ninety stroke patients, 65 years or older, living in their own homes and having no dementia diagnosis prior to hospital admission.
Methods: at discharge, physicians, nurses, occupational therapists and physiotherapists in the Departments of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics were asked to make an individual prognosis assessment regarding patients need for help, health and dwelling situation at 3 and 12 months after admission to hospital.
Results: the prognosis assessments were on average accurate in 68.4% (3 months) and 61.5% (12 months), far better than chance (33.3%). There were no significant differences between staff categories. The accuracy was influenced by a number of patient linked factors, such as activity degree, household situation before admission, and Mini Mental State Examination level and need of help measured 1 week after discharge, and ranged from 22 to 89%, depending on factor combinations.
Conclusions: prognosis assessments based on clinical judgement were on average quite accurate but the accuracy varied markedly with patient linked factors. Feedback of outcome might be one way to further improve the accuracy of prognosis assessment.
Keywords: prognosis assessment, outcome, functional capacity, health situation, dwelling, stroke, elderly
Received 5 June 2006; accepted in revised form 24 October 2006.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Olai, M. Omne-Ponten, L. Borgquist, and K. Svardsudd Survival, Hazard Function for a New Event, and Healthcare Utilization Among Stroke Patients >=65 Years Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3585 - 3590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Baird Improving stroke prognosis Neurology, October 6, 2009; 73(14): 1084 - 1085. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

