Skip Navigation


Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on March 26, 2007
Age and Ageing 2007 36(3):310-315; doi:10.1093/ageing/afm023
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/3/310    most recent
afm023v1
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowling, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ebrahim, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowling, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ebrahim, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.

Quality of life among older people with poor functioning. The influence of perceived control over life

Ann Bowling1,, Sharon Seetai1, Richard Morris1 and Shah Ebrahim2

1 Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, Hampstead Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK
2 Department of Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK

Address correspondence to: A. Bowling. Tel: +44(0) 2077940500; Fax: +44 (0)2077941224. Email a.bowling{at}ucl.ac.uk

Objective: to investigate the apparently incongruous coupling of poor physical functioning with high QoL.

Study design and setting: face-to-face interview survey of random sample of 999 people aged 65+ across Britain.

Results: twenty-one per cent of respondents reported fairly to very severe levels of functional difficulty, and 62% of these rated their QoL as ‘good’. Better self-rated health, lower burden of chronic disease, not having fallen, higher social engagement and higher levels of perceivd control ver life, distinguished between people who had difficulties with physical functioning and who perceived their QoL to be ‘good’, rather than ‘not good’. The open-ended survey responses broadly supported the quantitative findings.

Conclusion: people with difficulties with physical functioning, who perceived their QoL to be ‘not good’, as opposed to ‘good’, were adversely affected by a higher burden of disease and having fewer socio-psychological resources to help them to cope effectively.

Keywords: physical functioning, quality of life, health status, elderly, old age, control

Received 19 May 2006; accepted in revised form 25 January 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Health Serv Res PolicyHome page
S. Ebrahim, J. Adamson, S. Ayis, A. Beswick, and R. Gooberman-Hill
Locomotor disability: meaning, causes and effects of interventions
J Health Serv Res Policy, October 1, 2008; 13(suppl_3): 38 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
G Livingston, C Cooper, J Woods, A Milne, and C Katona
Successful ageing in adversity: the LASER-AD longitudinal study
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2008; 79(6): 641 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
A. H. Laybourne, S. Biggs, and F. C. Martin
Falls exercise interventions and reduced falls rate: Always in the patient's interest?
Age Ageing, January 1, 2008; 37(1): 10 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.