Skip Navigation


Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on May 30, 2007
Age and Ageing 2007 36(5):544-548; doi:10.1093/ageing/afm052
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/5/544    most recent
afm052v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lo, R. S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Woo, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lo, R. S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Woo, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.

Cross-cultural validation of the London Handicap Scale and comparison of handicap perception between Chinese and UK populations

Raymond See Kit Lo1,, Timothy Chi Yui Kwok2, Joanna Oi Yue Cheng1, Hui Yang2, Hong Jiang Yuan3, Rowan Harwood4 and Jean Woo2

1 Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Shatin Hospital, 33 A Kung Kok Street, Ma On Shan, New Territories, Hong Kong
2 Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, 9/F, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong
3 West China Health Promoting and Training Center on Aging, The 4th Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PRC 610041, China
4 Department of Health Care of the Elderly, A Floor East Block, University Hospital, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK

Address correspondence to: R. S. K. Lo. Tel: (852) 26367500; Fax: (852) 26351037. Email: losk{at}ha.org.hk

Objective: to validate the London Handicap Scale on populations from diverse cultures by comparing handicap perceptions in Mainland (Sichuan) Chinese, Hong Kong Chinese and UK subjects.

Method: utility ratings of 10 real life health scenarios were given by a group of healthy and disabled Sichuan Chinese subjects. The ratings were then correlated with published scale scores of HK and UK subjects on the same scenarios.

Setting: a university for older persons in Sichuan and the 4th Hospital of Sichuan University.

Subjects: two hundred and one Sichuan Chinese (mean age: 63.3 years) comprising of healthy (31.8%) and disabled individuals with stroke, fracture, cancer or other chronic conditions (69.2%) were recruited in the study.

Results: overall ratings for health scenarios were found to be highly correlated between Sichuan Chinese and UK subjects (r = 0.85; P < 0.0005), and between Sichuan and HK Chinese subjects (r = 0.98; P < 0.0005), with the exception of scenario J. Interesting differences in valuation were also observed between Sichuan subgroups in three scenarios. Self-perceived health status of the Sichuan Chinese can be accurately reflected by the severity of their handicap as measured by the London Handicap Scale LHS (r = –0.39, P = 0.000). For Sichuan Chinese, the economic domain of handicap was rated with poorer scores compared with the other domains.

Conclusion: the international notion of handicap, or limitation in participation, applies across different cultures and is also valid in mainland Chinese. UK, HK, and Sichuan subjects share similar perception on selected handicap scenarios. The London Handicap Scale is useful for health evaluation and outcome assessment for elderly of different cultures.

Keywords: aged, handicapped, London Handicap Scale, cross-cultural comparison, Chinese, elderly

Received 22 December 2006; accepted in revised form 20 March 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.