Skip Navigation


Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on July 23, 2007
Age and Ageing 2007 36(5):555-562; doi:10.1093/ageing/afm093
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/5/555    most recent
afm093v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.

Sit-to-stand as home exercise for mobility-limited adults over 80 years of age—GrandStand SystemTM may keep you standing?

Juliet Rosie and Denise Taylor

Health and Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Physiotherapy, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand

Address correspondence to: Juliet Rosie. Tel: +64 9 921 9999 x7177; Fax: +64 9 921 9620. Email: juliet.rosie{at}aut.ac.nz

Purpose to compare the effects of functional home exercise of repeated sit-to-stands with low-intensity progressive resistance training, on performance measures in mobility-limited adults over 80 years of age.

Setting participants' homes.

Design community-dwelling older adults ≥80 years of age were invited to participate in a randomised controlled clinical trial. Baseline and outcome measures were: comfortable gait velocity, 30-s chair-stand test, 15-s step test, Berg Balance Scale, Modified Falls Efficacy Scale and the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument—function component. Participants randomised to the intervention group performed repeated sit-to-stands using a GrandStand SystemTM; a biofeedback device that recorded and displayed the number of repetitions performed. Participants randomised to the control group performed knee extensions using ankle cuff weights. Both groups performed the exercises daily for 6 weeks.

Results sixty-six older adults took part. The intervention group had a statistically significant improvement in Berg Balance Scale mean score, 1.67 ± 2.64 points, P = 0.001 (control group 0.73 ± 3.63 points, P = 0.258), indicating an improvement in balance over the 6-week exercise period. There was no statistically significant effect of either intervention on the other outcome measures.

Conclusions in a highly variable population of older adults with mobility limitations, low-intensity functional home exercise of repeated sit-to-stands using the GrandStand SystemTM improved Berg Balance Scale score while low-intensity progressive resistance training did not. While statistically significant, the improvement in Berg Balance Scale score was modest raising the issue of what extent of change in score is clinically significant in this population.

Keywords: aged, 80 and over, balance, exercise, physical functioning, elderly

Received 17 October 2006; accepted in revised form 25 May 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.