Skip Navigation


Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on May 20, 2008
Age and Ageing 2008 37(4):368-378; doi:10.1093/ageing/afn112
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/4/368    most recent
afn112v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Healey, F.
Right arrow Articles by Connelly, J. B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Healey, F.
Right arrow Articles by Connelly, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.

Systematic Review

The effect of bedrails on falls and injury: a systematic review of clinical studies

Frances Healey1, David Oliver2, Alisoun Milne3 and James B. Connelly4

1 National Patient Safety Agency, 4-8 Maple Street, London W1 T 5HD UK
2 Department of Geriatric Medicine, Royal Berks Hospital, Reading, UK
3 Social Gerontology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
4 Brent Teaching Primary Care Trust, Wembley, UK

Address correspondence to: Frances Healey. Tel: 020 7927 9500. Email: frances.healey{at}npsa.nhs.uk

Background: around one-fourth of all falls in healthcare settings are falls from bed. The role of bedrails in falls prevention is controversial, with a prevailing orthodoxy that bedrails are harmful and ineffective.

Objective: to summarise and critically evaluate evidence on the effect of bedrails on falls and injury

Design: systematic literature review using the principles of QuoRoM guidance.

Setting and Subjects: adult healthcare settings

Review Methods: using the keyword, bedrail, and synonyms, databases were searched from 1980 to June 2007 for direct injury from bedrails or where falls, injury from falls, or any other effects were related to bedrail use.

Results: 472 papers were located; 24 met the criteria. Three bedrail reduction studies identified significant increases in falls or multiple falls, and one found that despite a significant decrease in falls in the discontinue-bedrails group, this group remained significantly more likely to fall than the continue-bedrails group; one case-control study found patients who had their bedrails raised significantly less likely to fall; one retrospective survey identified a significantly lower rate of injury and head injury in falls with bedrails up. Twelve papers described direct injury from bedrails.

Discussion: it is difficult to perform conventional clinical trials of an intervention already embedded in practice, and all included studies had methodological limitations. However, this review concludes that serious direct injury from bedrails is usually related to use of outmoded designs and incorrect assembly rather than being inherent, and bedrails do not appear to increase the risk of falls or injury from falls.

Keywords: accidental fall, injury, restraint, rail, bedrail, cot-side, elderly

Received 27 September 2007; accepted in revised form 11 April 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.