Skip Navigation


Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on June 19, 2008
Age and Ageing 2008 37(5):530-535; doi:10.1093/ageing/afn126
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/5/530    most recent
afn126v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Di Meo, F.
Right arrow Articles by Incalzi, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Di Meo, F.
Right arrow Articles by Incalzi, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.

Age does not hamper the response to pulmonary rehabilitation of COPD patients

Francesco Di Meo1, Claudio Pedone2, Sergio Lubich1, Carlo Pizzoli1, Marco Traballesi1 and Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi2

1 Fondazione Santa Lucia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Roma, Italy
2 Cattedra di Geriatria, Università Campus Biomedico, Roma, Italy

Address correspondence to: Claudio Pedone. Email: c.pedone{at}unicampus.it

Background: pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves health status and exercise tolerance, but not respiratory function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Our objective was to identify predictors of improvement in the 6-min walked distance (6'WD) in elderly COPD patients after PR.

Methods: this was a prospective observational study performed in an ambulatory rehabilitation setting. We enrolled 74 patients aged 65–83 years (mean: 74.2, SD: 4.4) with stable COPD in GOLD stage 3–4. About half (45.6%) of them had a basal O2 saturation of 90% or less. After a baseline multi-dimensional assessment, patients underwent a 20-session rehabilitation cycle including training of the upper and lower extremities, and respiratory exercises, along with education sessions. The difference between final and basal 6'WD was expressed as a per cent of the basal value (6'WD gain). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether the 6'WD gain was above or under the 75th percentile, corresponding to 33% gain.

Results: patients whose 6'WD improved more had lower baseline forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) (46.0 versus 52.2%, P = 0.03) and baseline 6'WD, both as an absolute value (329.5 versus 408.9 m, P = 0.01) and as a per cent of the predicted (71.1 versus 93.5%, P = 0.002). After correction for potential confounders, baseline 6'WD was the only variable associated with the outcome (OR for 5% increments: 0.79; 95% CI 0.65-0.95).

Conclusions: among elderly patients with COPD, a comprehensive rehabilitation programme can significantly improve the 6'WD even in the presence of chronic hypoxemia. The most physically impaired patients achieve the greatest benefit from rehabilitation, but we could not develop a model accurately predicting the response to rehabilitation.

Keywords: pulmonary rehabilitation, aged, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Received 18 December 2006; accepted in revised form 26 February 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.