Skip Navigation


Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on September 30, 2009
Age and Ageing 2009 38(6):730-733; doi:10.1093/ageing/afp177
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/6/730    most recent
afp177v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Potter, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wagg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Potter, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Do self-reported ‘integrated’ continence services provide high-quality continence care?

Adrian Wagg1,2, Derek Lowe2, Penny Peel2 and Jonathan Potter2

1 UCL – Geriatric Medicine, University College Hospital, 25 Grafton Way, London WC1E 6AU, UK
2 Royal College of Physicians of London – CEEu, London, UK

Address correspondence to: A. Wagg. Tel: (+44) 0207-380-9910; Fax: (+44) 0207-380-9652. Email: a.wagg{at}ucl.ac.uk

Introduction: systematic collection of clinical outcome data remains the most difficult task in the measurement of clinical effectiveness. However, the examination of the relationship between organisational and clinical process of care may provide a surrogate measure of quality in care.

Methods: data from the 2006 National Audit of Continence Care for Older People were used to examine whether there was an association between organisational structure and standard of continence care for older people. ‘Quality’ scores were produced and the relationship between scores was examined.

Results: there were statistically significant correlations between organisational and process scores for continence care. Primary care scored higher than hospitals or care homes in regard to service organisation [median (IQR): 57 (45–68) vs 48 (36–65) vs 50 (38–55), P = 0.001]. Differences were less with clinical process scores for urinary incontinence (UI) [median (IQR): 42 (32–52) vs 40 (29–49) vs 43 (34–52), P = 0.06] and for faecal incontinence (FI) [median: 42 (34–53) vs 45 (36–55) vs 47 (41–53), P = 0.12].

Conclusion: those with an integrated service provide higher quality care to older people. The provision of high-quality care for continence appears to be dependent upon well-organised services with personnel who have the appropriate training and skills to deliver the care.

Keywords: quality of care, clinical effectiveness, older people, continence, elderly

Received 25 February 2009; accepted in revised form 4 June 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.