Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRIFFITHS, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by SHELDON, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GRIFFITHS, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by SHELDON, M. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1975 Oxford University Press

research-article

THE CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF SYSTOLIC MURMURS IN THE ELDERLY

R. A. GRIFFITHS and M. G. SHELDON

The Cowley Road Hospital Oxford

A group of 278 patients, over the age of 60 years, and representative of geriatric and general medical admissions to the District General Hospital in Banbury, Oxfordshire, was studied to correlate the prevalence of systolic murmurs to age, sex, cardiac failure, ischaemic heart disease, dysrrhythmias, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease and anaemia. The object was to establish the clinical significance of these murmurs and test a postulate that they could not be dismissed as benign. Seventy-five per cent of the murmurs were judged to be aortic and 12 per cent mitral in origin.

The prevalence of systolic murmurs increased with age from 32 per cent at 60–64 years to 57 per cent over 85 years, and was greater in females (44 per cent) than in males (34 per cent). The presence of systolic murmurs was related to the presence of cardiac failure, ischaemic heart disease, dysrrhythmias, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease and anaemia. Only 8 per cent of patients with systolic murmurs had none of the above-mentioned six cardiovascular abnormalities compared with 36 per cent of patients without such a murmur, while multiple cardiovascular abnormalities were also commoner in the former group. The mortality rate in hospital was similar for patients with or without a systolic murmur.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. P. Murgo
Systolic ejection murmurs in the era of modern cardiology: What do we really know?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 1998; 32(6): 1596 - 1602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.