Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NOVAK, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NOVAK, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1979 Oxford University Press

research-article

THINKING ABOUT AGEING: A CRITIQUE OF LIBERAL SOCIAL GERONTOLOGY

MARK NOVAK

Department of Sociology, University of Winnipeg Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2E9

The paper begins by comparing the modern view of ageing, which sees ageing as a social problem, with the ancient Stoic account of ageing, which sees ageing as a spiritual problem. This comparison allows us to see how modern gerontology has redefined ageing and has created a new context for its discussion. Through this comparison we find that gerontology today displays an affinity for scientific research methods and a liberal orientation to public policy and that on these two pillars, it rests its promise for creating a good old age. After analysing and providing a critique of gerontology's commitments, the paper concludes with a discussion of an alternative conception of good ageing and with a recommendation for the genesis of an alternative form of gerontology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.