Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARTIN, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by KAHN, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MARTIN, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by KAHN, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1980 Oxford University Press

research-article

ANEUPLOIDY IN CULTURED HUMAN LYMPHOCYTES: I. AGE AND SEX DIFFERENCES

JUDITH M. MARTIN1, J. M. KELLETT2 and J. KAHN1

1Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Psychiatry De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF
2Department of Psychiatry, St George's Hospital Medical School Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT

The chromosomes of the lymphocytes of 208 subjects have been analysed in order to determine the relationship between age, sex and aneuploidy. The subjects consisted of 111 females and 34 males all over 65 years and 31 females and 32 males aged between 18 and 32 years. The degree of hypodiploidy (chromosome loss) differs significantly between the elderly and young subjects of each sex and between the aged males and females. Hyperdiploidy differs significantly only between the old and the young females. Giemsa banding shows that, in elderly females, increased hypodiploidy is especially due to the loss of an X-chromosome. The possible mechanisms accounting for these results are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.