Skip Navigation



Age and Ageing Advance Access published online on November 18, 2008
Age and Ageing, doi:10.1093/ageing/afn217
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/1/74    most recent
afn217v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moseley, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, I. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moseley, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, I. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Mobility training after hip fracture: a randomised controlled trial

Anne M. Moseley1, Catherine Sherrington1,2, Stephen R. Lord2, Elizabeth Barraclough2,3, Rebecca J. St George2 and Ian D. Cameron3

1 The George Institute for International Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
2 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Cnr Barker Street & Easy Street, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
3 Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Ryde, NSW 1680, Australia

Address correspondence to: A. M. Moseley. Tel: (+61) 2 9657 0385; Fax: (+61) 2 9657 0301. Email: amoseley{at}george.org.au

Objective: to compare the effects of two different exercise programmes after hip fracture.

Design: assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial.

Setting: hospital rehabilitation units, with continued intervention at home.

Subjects: 160 people with surgical fixation for hip fracture transferred to inpatient rehabilitation.

Method: in addition to other rehabilitation strategies, the intervention group received a higher dose (60 min/day) exercise programme conducted whilst standing and the control group received a lower dose exercise programme (30 min/day) primarily conducted whilst seated/supine. The primary outcome measures were knee extensor muscle strength in the fractured leg and walking speed, measured at 4 and 16 weeks.

Results: 150 participants (94% of those recruited) completed the trial. There were no differences between the groups for the two primary outcome measures. Post hoc analyses revealed increased walking speed among those in the higher dose, weight-bearing exercise group with cognitive impairment at 4 and 16 weeks.

Conclusions: there was no benefit (or harm) due to the higher dose, weight-bearing exercise programme with respect to the primary outcome measures. However, people with hip fracture and cognitive impairment gained greater benefit from the higher dose programme than from the lower dose programme.

Keywords: hip fracture, mobilisation, physical therapy, rehabilitation, cognitive impairment, elderly

Received 23 August 2007; accepted in revised form 2 July 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.