Skip Navigation


Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on October 1, 2008
Age and Ageing 2008 37(6):722; doi:10.1093/ageing/afn201
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/6/722    most recent
afn201v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lippi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Guidi, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lippi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Guidi, G. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Detecting of chronic kidney disease in older people by the MDRD and MCQ formulas

SIR—Healthcare professionals have been recently prompted by leaders of the American Association of Clinical Chemistry, the American Diabetes Association, the American Society of Nephrology and the College of American Pathologists as well as the National Kidney Disease Education Program to report estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by all hospital and commercial laboratories in the USA, preferably by using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula [1]. However, since this formula systematically underestimates GFR, and may erroneously categorise some healthy persons as having chronic kidney disease (CKD), a new ‘Mayo Clinic Quadratic’ (MCQ) equation has been developed [2]. We read with interest the article of Roderick et al., concluding that an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, calculated by the MDRD formula, is very common in older people [3].

To verify how both formulas perform in a population of older people, we analysed results of serum creatinine tests performed on consecutive outpatients aged 75 and over, referred by general practitioners for routine blood testing to our laboratory over the past year. Venous blood was routinely collected in the morning on fasting subjects. Serum creatinine was measured on a Roche/Hitachi Modular System P (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) by creatinine Jaffe, rate blanked and compensated assay. Throughout the study, the quality of results was validated by regular internal quality control procedures and participation in an External Quality Assessment Scheme. The eGFR was estimated by the MDRD formula, as modified by Levey et al. for methods traceable to the serum creatinine reference system [4], and the newer MCQ equation [GFR = exp{1.911 + (5.249/serum creatinine) – (2.114/serum creatinine2) – 0.00686 x age – 0.205 (if female)}; if serum creatinine is <71 µmol/l, it is replaced by 71 µmol/l] [2]. The significance of differences was assessed by the Mann–Whitney test (for continuous variables) and the {chi}2 test (for categorical variables).

Cumulative results were retrieved for 1,634 outpatients ≥75 years over the 1-year period (M/F = 726/908; age range: 75–91 years). The prevalence of CKD estimated by both formulas is reported in Table 1. Surprisingly, the prevalence of subjects with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 was remarkable lower when estimated by the MCQ formula, whereas the prevalence of subjects with eGFR either <45 or <30 ml/ min/1.73 m2 did not differ statistically.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula and the ‘Mayo Clinic Quadratic’ (MCQ) in 1,634 older outpatients

 
Although we could not measure eGFR by a reference method (i.e. iothalamate clearance), our results attest that routine calculation of eGFR using the newer MCQ equation rather than the MDRD formula would identify a smaller sub-group of older people with stage 3–5 CKD, while both formulas do not differ significantly in detecting more severe degrees of CKD (stages 4–5). Accordingly, the MCQ formula might be more appropriate in the ageing population, to prevent misclassification of ‘diseased’ individuals.

Giuseppe Lippi1,*, Giovanni Targher2, Gian Luca Salvagno1, Martina Montagnana1 and Gian Cesare Guidi1

1 Sezione di Chimica Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Morfologico-Biomediche
2 Sezione di Endocrinologia e Malattie del Metabolismo, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Verona, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed Email: ulippi{at}tin.it

References

  1. Increased reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate and call for improved creatinine traceability. Clin Chem (2008) 54:1098–9.[Free Full Text]
  2. Rule AD, Larson TS, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Jacobsen SJ, Cosio FG. Using serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med (2004) 141:929–37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Roderick PJ, Atkins RJ, Smeeth L, et al. Detecting chronic kidney disease in older people; what are the implications? Age Ageing (2008) 37:179–86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration. Expressing the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate with standardized serum creatinine values. Clin Chem (2007) 53:766–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/6/722    most recent
afn201v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lippi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Guidi, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lippi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Guidi, G. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?