© 1986 Oxford University Press
research-article |
URINARY INCONTINENCE AFTER STROKE: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
Department of Medicine, University of Otago P.O. Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Otago P.O. Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand
*Address correspondence to Professor A. J. Campbell, University of Otago, P.O. Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand
During one year 151 patients with 154 strokes were studied prospectively to determine the occurrence and outcome of urinary incontinence after a stroke. Seventeen per cent had pre-existing urinary incontinence. At 1, 4 and 12 weeks, 60%, 42% and 29% of the survivors, respectively, were not continent. Cystometry was performed in those with moderate or severe urinary incontinence persisting 4 weeks after the stroke. Detrusor instability was present in 85% of those who had been continent prior to their stroke. Factors associated with urinary incontinence at 4 weeks were moderate or severe motor deficit, impaired mobility and mental impairment (P<0.001). Two-thirds of patients with mild urinary incontinence at 4 weeks regained continence by 12 weeks.
accepted in revised form January 7, 1986.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Wilson, D. Lowe, A. Hoffman, A. Rudd, and A. Wagg Urinary incontinence in stroke: results from the UK National Sentinel Audits of Stroke 1998-2004 Age Ageing, September 1, 2008; 37(5): 542 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Harari, C. Coshall, A. G. Rudd, and C. D.A. Wolfe New-Onset Fecal Incontinence After Stroke: Prevalence, Natural History, Risk Factors, and Impact Stroke, January 1, 2003; 34(1): 144 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Patel, C. Coshall, A. G. Rudd, and C. D.A. Wolfe Natural History and Effects on 2-Year Outcomes of Urinary Incontinence After Stroke Stroke, January 1, 2001; 32(1): 122 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S H Jawad, A B Ward, and P Jones Study of the relationship between premorbid urinary incontinence and stroke functional outcome Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1999; 13(5): 447 - 452. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Brittain, S. M. Peet, and C. M. Castleden Stroke and Incontinence Stroke, February 1, 1998; 29(2): 524 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H C Hanger, G Walker, L A Paterson, S McBride, and R Sainsbury What do patients and their carers want to know about stroke? A two-year follow-up study Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 1998; 12(1): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakayama, H.S. Jorgensen, P.M. Pedersen, H.O. Raaschou, and T.S. Olsen Prevalence and Risk Factors of Incontinence After Stroke: The Copenhagen Stroke Study Stroke, January 1, 1997; 28(1): 58 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Fonda Management of the incontinent disabled patient Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1991; 5(4): 331 - 336. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. SOLOMON, H. L. JUDD, H. C. SIER, L. Z. RUBENSTEIN, and J. E. MORLEY New Issues in Geriatric Care Ann Intern Med, May 1, 1988; 108(5): 718 - 732. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||



