Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HSIEH, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by LIN, P.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HSIEH, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by LIN, P.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

other

Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Action Research arm test in stroke patients

CHING-LIN HSIEH, I-PING HSUEH, FU-MEI CHIANG1 and PO-HSIN LIN

School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University 7 Chun-Shan S. Road, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

Ching-Lin Hsieh. Fax (+886) 2 391 0614; E-mail: mike26{at}hamc.ntu.edu.tw

Background and purpose: the Action Research arm test (ARAT) was constructed for assessing recovery of upper extremity function after cortical injury. The objective of the study was to verify the inter-rater reliability and validity of the ARAT in stroke patients.

Methods: 50 stroke patients participated in the study. For the purpose of inter-rater study, the ARAT was administered by three experienced raters on each patient within a 3-day period. Validity was assessed by comparing the patients' scores on the ARAT with those obtained for the other well-validated measurements evaluating upper extremity motor impairment and disability.

Results: intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total score was 0.98 indicating very high inter-rater reliability. ICCs were also very high in each of the subscales. The score of the ARAT was closely correlated with that of the upper extremity part of the motor assessment scale, the arm sub-score of the motricity index and the upper extremity movements of the modified motor assessment chart (Pearson r = 0.96, 0.87 and 0.94, respectively).

Conclusion: the preliminary results of this study support the value of the ARAT for measuring recovery of arm-hand function in stroke patients.

Keywords: arm function, cerebrovascular disorders, disability evaluation, motor skills

Received February 26, 1997;
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J.-H. Lin, M.-J. Hsu, C.-F. Sheu, T.-S. Wu, R.-T. Lin, C.-H. Chen, and C.-L. Hsieh
Psychometric Comparisons of 4 Measures for Assessing Upper-Extremity Function in People With Stroke
Physical Therapy, August 1, 2009; 89(8): 840 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
S. J. Page, S. Maslyn, V. H. Hermann, A. Wu, K. Dunning, and P. G. Levine
Activity-Based Electrical Stimulation Training in a Stroke Patient With Minimal Movement in the Paretic Upper Extremity
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2009; 23(6): 595 - 599.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
A.M. Hughes, C.T. Freeman, J.H. Burridge, P.H. Chappell, P.L. Lewin, and E. Rogers
Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2009; 23(6): 559 - 568.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. A. Beebe and C. E. Lang
Active Range of Motion Predicts Upper Extremity Function 3 Months After Stroke
Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1772 - 1779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
Y.-w. Hsieh, C.-y. Wu, K.-c. Lin, Y.-f. Chang, C.-l. Chen, and J.-s. Liu
Responsiveness and Validity of Three Outcome Measures of Motor Function After Stroke Rehabilitation
Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1386 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
R. Turk, S. V. Notley, R. M. Pickering, D. M. Simpson, P. A. Wright, and J. H. Burridge
Reliability and Sensitivity of a Wrist Rig to Measure Motor Control and Spasticity in Poststroke Hemiplegia
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 684 - 696.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
L. Simmons, N. Sharma, J.-C. Baron, and V. M. Pomeroy
Motor Imagery to Enhance Recovery After Subcortical Stroke: Who Might Benefit, Daily Dose, and Potential Effects
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2008; 22(5): 458 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
N. Yozbatiran, L. Der-Yeghiaian, and S. C. Cramer
A Standardized Approach to Performing the Action Research Arm Test
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2008; 22(1): 78 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Burns, J. Burridge, and R. Pickering
Does the use of a constraint mitten to encourage use of the hemiplegic upper limb improve arm function in adults with subacute stroke?
Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2007; 21(10): 895 - 904.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
C. E. Lang and J. A. Beebe
Relating Movement Control at 9 Upper Extremity Segments to Loss of Hand Function in People with Chronic Hemiparesis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2007; 21(3): 279 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
T. Platz, C. Pinkowski, F. van Wijck, I.-H. Kim, P. di Bella, and G. Johnson
Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2005; 19(4): 404 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
E. Croarkin, J. Danoff, and C. Barnes
Evidence-Based Rating of Upper-Extremity Motor Function Tests Used for People Following a Stroke
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2004; 84(1): 62 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
H. Rodgers, J. Mackintosh, C. Price, R. Wood, P. McNamee, T. Fearon, A. Marritt, and R. Curless
Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome?
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2003; 17(6): 579 - 589.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
I-P. Hsueh and C.-L. Hsieh
Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2002; 16(6): 617 - 624.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. H van der Lee, L. D Roorda, H. Beckerman, G. J Lankhorst, and L. M Bouter
Improving the Action Research Arm test: a unidimensional hierarchical scale
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2002; 16(6): 646 - 653.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
I-P. Hsueh, M.-M. Lee, and C.-L. Hsieh
The Action Research Arm Test: is it necessary for patients being tested to sit at a standardized table?
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2002; 16(4): 382 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. H van der Lee, H. Beckerman, G. J Lankhorst, L. M Bouter, S. Blanton, and S. L Wolf
Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2000; 80(7): 711 - 713.
[Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Powell, A. D. Pandyan, M. Granat, M. Cameron, and D. J. Stott
Electrical Stimulation of Wrist Extensors in Poststroke Hemiplegia
Stroke, July 1, 1999; 30(7): 1384 - 1389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.