Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Firvida, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Estape, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Firvida, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Estape, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing, Vol 28, 103-105, Copyright © 1999 by British Geriatrics Society

ARTICLES

Age: a critical factor in cancer management. A prospective comparative study of 400 patients

JL Firvida, N Vinolas, M Munoz, JJ Grau, M Daniels, A Estape and J Estape
Servicio de Coordinacion Oncologica, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.

BACKGROUND: older people are often excluded from cancer treatments solely on the grounds of age. AIMS: to compare cancer treatment in older and younger patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: between June 1992 and September 1994, 400 cancer patients were included in this prospective comparative study. The factors compared between younger and older subjects were performance status, associated chronic diseases, delay in diagnosis, stage of disease and initial treatment. RESULTS: 54 patients (25.5%) under 70 years of age were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, in comparison with 25 (12.5%) of the 200 older patients (P < 0.001). Associated chronic pathologies were more frequent in the older patients (55% vs 18.5%, P < 0.001). There were no statistical differences between both groups in diagnostic delay. Localized disease was found in 127 (63%) of the younger patients and in 109 (54%) of the older patients, the difference not being significant. The percentage of patients who underwent oncological treatment was higher in the younger than the older group (87.5% vs 56%, P < 0.001). The main cause of therapeutic exclusion in both groups was poor performance status; however, in the older group other variables--such as the presence of chronic disease and patients' or relatives' wishes and doctors' opinions--influenced the decision not to give specific treatment. CONCLUSIONS: this study confirms that the clinical characteristics and treatment of aged people with cancer are different from those of younger patients. Nevertheless, there is considerable doubt about whether an arbitrary age limit should continue to be accepted as a discriminatory factor in some diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in cancer patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
J. H. Rose, E. E. O'Toole, D. Einstadter, T. E. Love, C. A. Shenko, and N. V. Dawson
Patient Age, Well-Being, Perspectives, and Care Practices in the Early Treatment Phase for Late-Stage Cancer
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., September 1, 2008; 63(9): 960 - 968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.