Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sulch, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kalra, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sulch, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kalra, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing 2002; 31: 175-179
© 2002, British Geriatrics Society


Research papers

Does an integrated care pathway improve processes of care in stroke rehabilitation? A randomized controlled trial

David Sulch, Andrew Evans1, Anne Melbourn1 and Lalit Kalra1

Department of Adult Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Stadium Road, Woolwich, London SE18 4QH, UK
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Guy's, King's & St Thomas' School of Medicine, Denmark Hill Campus, London, UK

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate whether integrated care pathways improve the processes of care in stroke rehabilitation.

Design: comparison of processes of care data collected in a randomized controlled trial.

Participants: acute stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation randomized to receive integrated care pathways management (n=76) or conventional multidisciplinary care (n=76).

Measurements: proportion of patients meeting recommended standards for processes of care using a validated stroke audit tool.

Results: integrated care pathways methodology was associated with higher frequency of stroke specific assessments, notably testing for inattention (84% versus 60%; P=0.015) and nutritional assessment (74% versus 22%, P<0.001). Documentation of provision of certain information to patients/carers (89% versus 70%; P=0.024) and early discharge notification to general practitioners (80% versus 45%; P<0.001) were also more common in this group. There were no significant differences in the processes of interdisciplinary co-ordination and patient management between the integrated care pathways group and the control group.

Conclusion: integrated care pathways may improve assessment and communication, even in specialist stroke settings.

Keywords: outcome, pathway, processes, rehabilitation, stroke


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. Hart and R. Morris
Screening for depression after stroke: an exploration of professionals' compliancewith guidelines
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2008; 22(1): 60 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
N.J.A. van Exel, M.A. Koopmanschap, W. Scholte op Reimer, L.W. Niessen, and R. Huijsman
Cost-effectiveness of integrated stroke services
QJM, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 415 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J Monaghan, K Channell, D McDowell, and A K Sharma
Improving patient and carer communication, multidisciplinary team working and goal-setting in stroke rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2005; 19(2): 194 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. Sulch, A. Melbourn, I. Perez, and L. Kalra
Integrated Care Pathways and Quality of Life on a Stroke Rehabilitation Unit
Stroke, June 1, 2002; 33(6): 1600 - 1604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.