Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on March 26, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Age and Ageing 2004; 33: 362-367
Age and Ageing Vol. 33 No. 4 © British Geriatrics Society 2004; all rights reserved
Research Paper |
Effects of introducing an integrated care pathway in an acute stroke unit
* Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
1 University Department of Geriatric Medicine, Level E (MP807), Centre Block, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
2 Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
* Place where work was done
Address correspondence to: J. Kwan. Fax: (+44) 2380 796128. Email: jk{at}1to1.org
Abstract
Background and purpose: integrated care pathways are often implemented to guide acute stroke therapy and improve organisation of care, but there is not sufficient evidence to support their routine use. We sought to evaluate the effects of introducing an integrated care pathway for acute stroke.
Methods: we performed a before-and-after study. The ‘before’ (control) group comprised 154 consecutive stroke patients admitted to the acute stroke unit over a 9-month period. The ‘after’ (intervention) group comprised 197 consecutive patients admitted to the same unit over a 9-month period in the year after the introduction of the integrated care pathway. Effectiveness was assessed with a variety of measures: quality of documentation; process of care; occurrence of complications; death and discharge destination. Results were adjusted for case mix using a validated model.
Results: the baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar, although there were more total anterior circulation strokes (29% versus 18%, P = 0.005) and fewer partial anterior circulation strokes (30% versus 42% P = 0.04) in the intervention group. In the intervention group, we found that urinary tract infections were significantly less frequent (OR 0.37, CI 0.15–10.91) and the quality of several aspects of care (e.g. CT scanning < 48 hours) and documentation were significantly better. However, there were no significant differences in deaths, discharge destination, or length of stay between the two groups.
Conclusion: this before-and-after study has provided further evidence that introducing an integrated care pathway for acute stroke may improve the quality of documentation and process of care, and reduce the risk of certain post-stroke complications.
Keywords: critical pathway, hospitalisation, cerebrovascular disease, subacute care, elderly
Received September 14, 2003; Revision received January 12, 2004. accepted in revised form January 12, 2004.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Summers, A. Leonard, D. Wentworth, J. L. Saver, J. Simpson, J. A. Spilker, N. Hock, E. Miller, P. H. Mitchell, and on behalf of the American Heart Association Counci Comprehensive Overview of Nursing and Interdisciplinary Care of the Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Stroke, August 1, 2009; 40(8): 2911 - 2944. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Hart and R. Morris Screening for depression after stroke: an exploration of professionals' compliancewith guidelines Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2008; 22(1): 60 - 70. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Kwan and P. Sandercock In-Hospital Care Pathways for, Stroke: An Updated Systematic Review Stroke, June 1, 2005; 36(6): 1348 - 1349. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|