Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on September 20, 2004
Age and Ageing 2004 33(6):582-588; doi:10.1093/ageing/afh200
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Age and Ageing Vol. 33 No. 6 © British Geriatrics Society 2004; all rights reserved
Research Paper |
A cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate a policy of making hip protectors available to residents of nursing homes
1 School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
2 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
3 Florence Elliott Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
4 School of Nursing, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK
5 School of Policy Studies, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK
6 Department of Public Health Medicine and Nursing, Belfast, UK
Address correspondence to: P. D. O'Halloran, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK. Fax: (+44) 28 9097 2328. Email: p.ohalloran{at}qub.ac.uk
Abstract
Objectives: to evaluate the effectiveness of a policy of making hip protectors available to residents of nursing homes.
Design: a cluster randomised controlled trial of the policy in nursing and residential homes, with the home as the unit of randomisation.
Setting: 127 nursing and residential homes in the greater Belfast area of Northern Ireland.
Participants: 40 homes in the intervention group (representing 1,366 occupied beds) and 87 homes in the control group (representing 2,751 occupied beds).
Interventions: a policy of making hip protectors available free of charge to residents of nursing homes and supporting the implementation process by employing a nurse facilitator to encourage staff in the homes to promote their use, over a 72-week period.
Main outcome measures: the rate of hip fractures in intervention and control homes, and the level of adherence to use of hip protectors.
Results: there were 85 hip fractures in the intervention homes and 163 in the control homes. The mean fracture rate per 100 residents was 6.22 in the intervention homes and 5.92 in the control homes, giving an adjusted rate ratio for the intervention group compared to the control group of 1.05 (95% CI 0.77, 1.43, P = 0.76). Initial acceptance of the hip protectors was 37.2% (508/1,366) with adherence falling to 19.9% (272/1,366) at 72 weeks.
Conclusions: making hip protectors available to residents of nursing and residential homes did not reduce the rate of hip fracture. This research does not support the introduction of a policy of providing hip protectors to residents of nursing homes.
Keywords: hip protectors, hip fracture, older people, falls, randomised controlled trial, health services research, fractured neck of femur, elderly, nursing home
Received April 12, 2004; accepted in revised form June 18, 2004.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Cox, S. Puffer, V. Morton, C. Cooper, J. Hodson, T. Masud, D. Oliver, D. Preedy, P. Selby, M. Stone, et al. Educating nursing home staff on fracture prevention: a cluster randomised trial Age Ageing, March 1, 2008; 37(2): 167 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Minns, A.-M. Marsh, A. Chuck, and J. Todd Are hip protectors correctly positioned in use? Age Ageing, March 1, 2007; 36(2): 140 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Haines, K. D. Hill, K. L. Bennell, and R. H. Osborne Hip protector use amongst older hospital inpatients: compliance and functional consequences Age Ageing, September 1, 2006; 35(5): 520 - 523. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J Parker, W. J Gillespie, and L. D Gillespie Effectiveness of hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in elderly people: systematic review BMJ, March 11, 2006; 332(7541): 571 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

