Skip Navigation

Age and Ageing 2005 34(1):52-56; doi:10.1093/ageing/afh231
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Villar, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Villar, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age and Ageing Vol. 34 No. 1 © British Geriatrics Society 2005; all rights reserved

Research Paper

An in-service evaluation of hip protector use in residential homes

Paul Thompson1, Carol Jones2, Adrian Dawson3, Peter Thomas4 and Tracy Villar5

1 Poole Hospital NHS Trust, Poole, Dorset BH15 2JB, UK
2 Osteoporosis Dorset, Shelley Road, Bournemouth, Dorset BH1 4JQ, UK
3 Dorset Health Authority, Victoria House, Ferndown, Dorset BH22 9JR, UK
4 Institute of Health and Community Studies, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, Dorset BH1 3LG, UK
5 Department of Medicine for the Elderly, Poole Hospital NHS Trust, Poole, Dorset BH15 2JB, UK

Address correspondence to: P. Thompson. Fax: (+44) 1202 660147. Email: paul.thompson{at}poole.nhs.uk

Abstract

Background: the establishment of a hip protector service has allowed us to study eligibility, acceptability and compliance with use, reasons for non-use, and the effect of dementia, confusion, incontinence and risk of falling.

Methods: all residents in all residential homes in Poole were assessed at baseline. All eligible residents were offered 1 week's trial of protectors and those who wished to continue were given a set of protectors. Compliance was assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months. Percentages shown for compliance exclude those who died, were transferred, had lost data or in whom follow-up was not yet completed.

Results: over 18 months, 873 residents from 47 homes were identified (mean age 88 years, female:male 4.5:1). Of these, 745 were considered eligible to wear protectors (86%) and 535 agreed to wear them after 1 week (72%). Compliance over 12 months was 78%. Most wearers wore protectors every day. At 3 months, 83% of demented compared to 73% of not demented residents (P = 0.023), 86% of always confused, 77% of sometimes confused and 72% of never confused (P < 0.009) and 82% of incontinent compared to 73% of continent residents (P = 0.024) were wearing hip protectors. There was a positive linear trend between the risk of falling and compliance (P = 0.048).

Conclusions: the results suggest that there is a 48% chance of a resident wearing the protectors after 1 year. The higher compliance among those with dementia, confusion, incontinence and at high risk of falling supports the concept that hip protectors are worn by those at greatest risk of fracture.

Keywords: falls, eligibility, compliance, dementia, incontinence

Received December 16, 2003; accepted in revised form August 11, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
C Cryer, A Knox, and E Stevenson
Factors associated with hip protector adherence among older people in residential care
Inj. Prev., February 1, 2008; 14(1): 24 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.