Skip Navigation

Age and Ageing 2005 34(6):577-583; doi:10.1093/ageing/afi179
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fear, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fear, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A whole system study of intermediate care services for older people

John B. Young1, Mike Robinson1, Sue Chell1, Diana Sanderson2, Stephen Chaplin2, Eileen Burns3 and Jon Fear4

1 Nuffield Institute for Health, Leeds, UK
2 York Health Economics Consortium, York, UK
3 Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
4 Leeds West, Primary Care Trust, Leeds, UK

Address correspondence to: J. B. Young. Email: john.young{at}bradfordhospitals.nhs.uk

Background: intermediate care (IC) services have been widely introduced in England and have the strategic objectives of reducing hospital and long-term care use. There is uncertainty about the clinical outcomes of these services and whether their strategic aims will be realised.

Setting: a metropolitan city in northern England.

Design: a quasi-experimental study comparing a group of older people before and after the introduction of an IC service. A quota sampling method was used to match the groups.

Subjects: patients presenting as emergency admissions to two elderly care departments with falls, confusion, incontinence or immobility.

Intervention: a city-wide service in which a joint care management team (multi-agency, multi-disciplinary) assessed patient need and purchased support and rehabilitation from sector-based IC teams.

Outcomes: Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living score, Barthel Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression score, mortality, readmission to hospital, and new institutional care placement at 3, 6 and 12 months post-recruitment.

Results: there were 800 and 848 patients, respectively, in the control and intervention groups. Clinical outcomes, hospital and long-term care use were similar between the groups. Uptake of IC was lower than anticipated at 29%. An embedded case–control study comparing the 246 patients who received IC with a matched sample from the control group demonstrated similar clinical outcomes but increased hospital bed days used over 12 months (mean +8 days; 95% CI 3.1–13.0).

Conclusion: this city-wide IC service was associated with similar clinical outcomes but did not achieve its strategic objectives of reducing long-term care and hospital use.

Keywords: intermediate care, older people, clinical trial, elderly

Received October 19, 2004; accepted in revised form July 14, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Age AgeingHome page
J. Young, A. Forster, J. Green, and S. Bogle
Post-acute transfer of older people to intermediate care services: the sooner the better?
Age Ageing, September 1, 2007; 36(5): 589 - 592.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Age AgeingHome page
J. Young and J. Stevenson
Intermediate care in England: where next?
Age Ageing, July 1, 2006; 35(4): 339 - 341.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
J. R Gladman
Transitional care for elderly people: Intermediate care can be safe and reduce hospital use, but is it and does it?
BMJ, November 26, 2005; 331(7527): 1271 - 1271.
[Full Text]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.